digitalmars.D.bugs - [Issue 5312] New: Function redefinition is allowed (duplicate functions)
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (25/25) Dec 03 2010 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5312
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (12/12) Dec 03 2010 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5312
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5312
Summary: Function redefinition is allowed (duplicate functions)
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: DMD
AssignedTo: nobody puremagic.com
ReportedBy: bdom.pub+deebugz gmail.com
06:32:16 PST ---
The following compiles fine in terms of semantic analysis:
bool foo() { return false; }
bool foo() { return false; }
class X {
bool foo() { return false; }
bool foo() { return false; }
}
Rather we get two "Previous Definition Different" linker errors. But surely
this should be a compiler error, right? (at the semantic level)
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Dec 03 2010
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5312
Stewart Gordon <smjg iname.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC| |smjg iname.com
Resolution| |DUPLICATE
*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of issue 1003 ***
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Dec 03 2010








d-bugmail puremagic.com