www.digitalmars.com         C & C++   DMDScript  

digitalmars.D.bugs - [Issue 4806] New: Typo in transversal

reply d-bugmail puremagic.com writes:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4806

           Summary: Typo in transversal
           Product: D
           Version: D2
          Platform: Other
        OS/Version: Windows
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: Phobos
        AssignedTo: nobody puremagic.com
        ReportedBy: andrej.mitrovich gmail.com



10:20:27 PDT ---
Code from: http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/phobos/std_range.html#transversal

int[][] x = new int[][2];
x[0] = [1, 2];
x[1] = [3, 4];
auto ror = transversal(x, 1);
assert(equals(ror, [ 2, 4 ][]));

Last line should be:
assert(equal(ror, [ 1, 3 ][]));

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Sep 03 2010
next sibling parent d-bugmail puremagic.com writes:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4806


Lars T. Kyllingstad <bugzilla kyllingen.net> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
                 CC|                            |bugzilla kyllingen.net
         Resolution|                            |FIXED



01:59:02 PST ---
Nope, [2, 4] is correct. [1, 3] are the 0th elements.  The equals->equal typo
was fixed in

https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/commit/3ec3fee75ae62aa72946d6ae5a132f5159ff0f9c

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Feb 03 2011
prev sibling parent d-bugmail puremagic.com writes:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4806




13:29:27 PST ---
You're right. It must have been a brainfart. :)

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Feb 03 2011