digitalmars.D.bugs - [Issue 4585] New: DMD2 should look for dmd2.conf
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (22/22) Aug 05 2010 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4585
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (15/15) Aug 05 2010 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4585
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (6/6) Aug 05 2010 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4585
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (11/12) Aug 05 2010 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4585
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (16/24) Aug 06 2010 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4585
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (15/37) Aug 06 2010 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4585
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (12/17) Aug 06 2010 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4585
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (6/6) Aug 06 2010 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4585
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4585
Summary: DMD2 should look for dmd2.conf
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: DMD
AssignedTo: nobody puremagic.com
ReportedBy: llucax gmail.com
PDT ---
If you want to have both dmd1 and dmd2 installed, the fact that both binaries
look for the same dmd.conf file is a big complication. It would be nice is dmd2
looked for dmd2.conf instead (or at least look for both, but fist for the
dmd2.conf).
Naming the binary dmd2 could be nice too, but that can be done by the user,
changing what config files to search is not possible.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Aug 05 2010
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4585
Steven Schveighoffer <schveiguy yahoo.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |schveiguy yahoo.com
07:01:34 PDT ---
Better idea:
argv[0] ~ ".conf"
Then you can have things like:
dmd-2.047.conf
dmd-2.041.conf
etc.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Aug 05 2010
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4585 19:50:20 PDT --- Does argv[0] contain full path to the binary? -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Aug 05 2010
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4585 PDT ---Does argv[0] contain full path to the binary?No, at least on unix, is the same command you typed, but you can always do basename(argv[0]) and search for that file where the dmd binary (which is already searched by DMD) is, and the other search paths. So I think is a viable option. I find a little odd that the config file changes if you change the binary name, but I can see how it can be pragmatic. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Aug 05 2010
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4585 04:41:09 PDT ---Yes, you can find the path to the binary, or at least the command being run (if its a symlink) by searching the PATH. I think DMD already must do this, because argv[0] is pretty much what's available to find the executable directory in the first place.Does argv[0] contain full path to the binary?No, at least on unix, is the same command you typed, but you can always do basename(argv[0]) and search for that file where the dmd binary (which is already searched by DMD) is, and the other search paths.So I think is a viable option. I find a little odd that the config file changes if you change the binary name, but I can see how it can be pragmatic.Often, I have several dmd2 compilers that I want to test because I'm working on bugs in phobos or because I want to know where a regression happened. Currently, I have to specify the full path to the exe, it would be nice to just have them all live in the same directory, and I could then put that dir in my path. So your original solution wouldn't work for this. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Aug 06 2010
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4585
Jacob Carlborg <doob me.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |doob me.com
Does argv[0] contain full path to the binary?
No, at least on unix, is the same command you typed, but you can always do
basename(argv[0]) and search for that file where the dmd binary (which is
already searched by DMD) is, and the other search paths.
Yes, you can find the path to the binary, or at least the command being run (if
its a symlink) by searching the PATH. I think DMD already must do this,
because argv[0] is pretty much what's available to find the executable
directory in the first place.
There are system functions to get the path to the currently running executable.
I made a function for this to Tango that works on Windows, Linux, Mac OS X and
FreeBSD: http://dsource.org/projects/tango/attachment/ticket/1536/process.d .
I'm willing to license the code to whatever license necessary for inclusion in
dmd.
So I think is a viable option. I find a little odd that the config file changes
if you change the binary name, but I can see how it can be pragmatic.
Often, I have several dmd2 compilers that I want to test because I'm working on
bugs in phobos or because I want to know where a regression happened.
Currently, I have to specify the full path to the exe, it would be nice to just
have them all live in the same directory, and I could then put that dir in my
path.
So your original solution wouldn't work for this.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Aug 06 2010
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4585 05:35:08 PDT ---There are system functions to get the path to the currently running executable. I made a function for this to Tango that works on Windows, Linux, Mac OS X and FreeBSD: http://dsource.org/projects/tango/attachment/ticket/1536/process.d . I'm willing to license the code to whatever license necessary for inclusion in dmd.Thanks for the offer. But I'd rather not get the exact executable. I used to use symlinks to trick dmd into thinking it was in another directory, I don't want to disable that by having dmd ignore the symlink location. But your offer is generous, and probably would be good to have in phobos. I will keep it in mind! (Phobos' process is due for an update but is blocked by a nasty compiler bug) -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Aug 06 2010
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4585 13:15:18 PDT --- You either want them to be in one directory or in different. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Aug 06 2010









d-bugmail puremagic.com 