digitalmars.D.bugs - [Issue 4532] New: Position specifiers don't work in format
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (18/18) Jul 29 2010 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4532
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (11/11) Jul 30 2010 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4532
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (12/12) Aug 18 2010 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4532
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (10/10) Aug 16 2011 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4532
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (10/10) Apr 01 2012 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4532
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (10/10) Apr 01 2012 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4532
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (10/10) Apr 01 2012 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4532
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (10/10) Apr 01 2012 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4532
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (10/10) Apr 01 2012 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4532
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (6/6) Apr 09 2012 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4532
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (6/6) Apr 09 2012 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4532
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (9/49) Apr 09 2012 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4532
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (10/10) Apr 10 2012 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4532
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (20/20) Apr 20 2012 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4532
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (13/15) Apr 20 2012 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4532
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (13/13) Apr 20 2012 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4532
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (10/10) Jan 24 2013 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4532
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4532 Summary: Position specifiers don't work in format Product: D Version: D2 Platform: Other OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: DMD AssignedTo: nobody puremagic.com ReportedBy: cbkbbejeap mailinator.com 11:18:09 PDT --- writefln("%1$s", "A"); // Prints "A" format("%1$s", "A"); // Throws FormatError -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Jul 29 2010
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4532 Stewart Gordon <smjg iname.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |smjg iname.com This is most peculiar. Why has it been added directly into writef, rather than being put in doFormat where it belongs? -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Jul 30 2010
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4532 I've just looked at the code and seem to have figured out what's going on. Traditionally, std.format.doFormat is the function that underlies all the writef* functions and std.string.format. However, a new templated function has been written to replace it, std.format.formattedWrite. The problem is that std.string.format still uses doFormat, as do the writef* functions in std.stream and others. We need to get this fixed, and then deprecate doFormat. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Aug 18 2010
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4532 Nick Sabalausky <cbkbbejeap mailinator.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |simendsjo gmail.com 12:42:22 PDT --- *** Issue 6455 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. *** -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Aug 16 2011
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4532 Stewart Gordon <smjg iname.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bugzilla kyllingen.net *** Issue 5687 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. *** -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Apr 01 2012
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4532 Stewart Gordon <smjg iname.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |k.hara.pg gmail.com *** Issue 6595 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. *** -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Apr 01 2012
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4532 Stewart Gordon <smjg iname.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tomeksowi gmail.com *** Issue 5444 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. *** -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Apr 01 2012
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4532 Stewart Gordon <smjg iname.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bearophile_hugs eml.cc *** Issue 7571 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. *** -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Apr 01 2012
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4532 Stewart Gordon <smjg iname.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |andrej.mitrovich gmail.com *** Issue 7620 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. *** -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Apr 01 2012
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4532 *** Issue 7877 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. *** -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Apr 09 2012
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4532 --- *** Issue 7881 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. *** -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Apr 09 2012
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4532 --- Issue 6595 was a bug report only about std.string.format/sformat functions.This enhancement issue is nearly a bug report. format() and sformat() use std.format.doFormat as their implementations, but it is old feature, and its features are fewer than formatValue family. And it is causing not a few issues: bug 3715 - std.string.format can't use const/immutable toString functions bug 4266 - add support for structs in std.format.doFormat bug 4532 - Position specifiers don't work in format bug 5444 - std.string.format: arguments without format specifier appended to result bug 5970 - fix BigInt.toString I think format() should be implemented just appender and formattedWrite like follows: string format(Char, Args...)(in Char[] fmt, Args args) { auto w = appender!string(); formattedWrite(w, fmt, args); return w.data; } This 'format()' provides just the same features as writef(ln) functions about formatting. And sformat() also could replace like follows: char[] sformat(Char, Args...)(char[] buf, in Char[] fmt, Args args) { size_t i; void sink(const(char)[] s) { if (buf.length < i + s.length) onRangeError("std.string.sformat", 0); buf[i .. i + s.length] = s[]; i += s.length; } formattedWrite(&sink, fmt, args); return buf[0 .. i]; }And I proposed a pull and it is discussed in here: https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/231 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Apr 09 2012
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4532 Stewart Gordon <smjg iname.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jmdavisProg gmx.com *** Issue 4754 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. *** -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Apr 10 2012
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4532 This seems another example of the same problem: import std.stdio: writeln; import std.conv: text; struct Foo {} void main() { Foo* f = new Foo; writeln(f); writeln(text(f)); } Output: 15D2FD0 22884304 Expected output: 15D2FD0 15D2FD0 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Apr 20 2012
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4532 I've taken a look here: https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/231 Kenji Hara sasy:The same name with core.stdc.sprintf is very confusing. And std.string.format returns new string, but core.stdc.sprintf write the formatted string into specified buffer. The two behaviors are quite different.<Andrei Alexandrescu says:There's no problem with core.stdc.sprintf bearing the same name as std.format.sprintf. Phobos has had such duplicate names for years without a problem.<I agree that Phobos has some name clashes. But I don't agree it's a good thing. It should be avoided if possible for newly added names. And I agree the behavior of the new functions is different from the C functions. So I agree with Kenji Hara, they should have different names. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Apr 20 2012
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4532 text is just to!string wrapped in a variadic template to support multiple arguments. The implementation of to!string for pointer types (line 1259 in conv.d, in 2.059) converts it to a size_t, which is an integral type, leading to it being formatted as decimal. I'm not sure whether it's related or not. But what it does show is that we need to investigate the long chains of template instantiations all these various functions go through. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Apr 20 2012
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4532 16:22:09 PST --- It seems all code samples in this issue are fixed. There seems to be very few doFormat calls left in Phobos: std\stdio.d:1498: std.format.doFormat(&putc, arguments, argptr); std\stdio.d:1533: std.format.doFormat(&putcw, arguments, argptr); std\stream.d:1209: doFormat(&doFormatCallback,arguments,argptr); -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Jan 24 2013