digitalmars.D.bugs - [Issue 4526] New: dmd crash with writeln of functions
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (29/29) Jul 28 2010 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4526
- Brad Roberts (3/12) Jul 28 2010 Um.. stop that. Don't mix bug reports with discussion of only
- bearophile (4/7) Jul 28 2010 You are right, that muddles two different things. To fix the situation I...
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (12/12) Jul 28 2010 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4526
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4526 Summary: dmd crash with writeln of functions Product: D Version: D2 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: DMD AssignedTo: nobody puremagic.com ReportedBy: bearophile_hugs eml.cc D2 code, compiled with dmd 2.047: import std.stdio; void main() { string a(); writeln(typeid(typeof(a))); string function() b; writeln(typeid(typeof(b))); } By the way, what's the point in allowing/keeping ugly and error-prone function literals in D2? It's better for D2 to keep/allow only _one_ standard, clean and readable syntax for functions pointers (and one for delegates, if necessary). Keeping C function pointer syntax or something similar in D2 causes troubles. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Jul 28 2010
(cut) By the way, what's the point in allowing/keeping ugly and error-prone function literals in D2? It's better for D2 to keep/allow only _one_ standard, clean and readable syntax for functions pointers (and one for delegates, if necessary). Keeping C function pointer syntax or something similar in D2 causes troubles.Um.. stop that. Don't mix bug reports with discussion of only semi-related stuff together. Don't use bugzilla as a discussion thread in general.
Jul 28 2010
Brad Roberts:Um.. stop that. Don't mix bug reports with discussion of only semi-related stuff together. Don't use bugzilla as a discussion thread in general.You are right, that muddles two different things. To fix the situation I have closed it and created a bug report (4529) and an enhancement request (4530). Sorry, bye, bearophile
Jul 28 2010
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4526 bearophile_hugs eml.cc changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |INVALID Closed because Brad Roberts has correctly noted this is a bug report and an enchantment request in one. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Jul 28 2010