digitalmars.D.bugs - [Issue 3892] New: Built-in "set" type similar to associative arrays
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (35/35) Mar 08 2010 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3892
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (12/12) May 22 2010 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3892
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3892 Summary: Built-in "set" type similar to associative arrays Product: D Version: 2.030 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: DMD AssignedTo: nobody puremagic.com ReportedBy: Justin.SpahrSummers gmail.com 2010-03-08 03:03:42 CST --- It's rather low priority, but it'd be nice to have built-in set functionality (here meaning an unordered data structure where no duplicate values can exist). Associative arrays can already fill the role to some extent if you just opt not to use the values at all, but that's a waste of storage. Syntax could even be similar, using "void" in place of a value type: --- void main () { void[string] set; set.add("hello"); assert("hello" in set); set.add("hello"); set.remove("hello"); assert(!("hello" in set)); } --- If creating a new property ("add") is out of the question, even something like... set["hello"] = true; could work. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Mar 08 2010
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3892 Don <clugdbug yahoo.com.au> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC| |clugdbug yahoo.com.au Resolution| |DUPLICATE *** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of issue 1606 *** -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
May 22 2010