www.digitalmars.com         C & C++   DMDScript  

digitalmars.D.bugs - [Issue 2851] New: Segfault using C-style struct initializer with too few arguments

reply d-bugmail puremagic.com writes:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2851

           Summary: Segfault using C-style struct initializer with too few
                    arguments
           Product: D
           Version: 2.027
          Platform: PC
        OS/Version: Windows
            Status: NEW
          Keywords: accepts-invalid, ice-on-invalid-code
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: DMD
        AssignedTo: bugzilla digitalmars.com
        ReportedBy: clugdbug yahoo.com.au


The bug is that it doesn't check that the number of members in the initializer
is correct. It's silently accepted as long as you don't access an uninitialised
member; if you do, the compiler segfaults.

----
struct Test{
 int foo;
}

enum Test test = {};
enum q = test.foo;


--
Apr 17 2009
next sibling parent d-bugmail puremagic.com writes:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2851






Fixed in DMD2.030, NOT FIXED in DMD1.045.

struct Test{
 int foo;
}

const Test test = {};
const q = test.foo;

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
May 14 2009
prev sibling next sibling parent d-bugmail puremagic.com writes:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2851


Walter Bright <bugzilla digitalmars.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED





12:19:00 PDT ---
Fixed dmd 2.030

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
May 15 2009
prev sibling next sibling parent d-bugmail puremagic.com writes:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2851


Gide Nwawudu <gide nwawudu.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |REOPENED
                 CC|                            |gide nwawudu.com
         Resolution|FIXED                       |





Re-opened because DMD 1.045 segfaults.

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
May 15 2009
prev sibling next sibling parent d-bugmail puremagic.com writes:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2851


Don <clugdbug yahoo.com.au> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|                            |patch





Seems like this was just missed in copying from D2 to D1.
Segfaulting in StructLiteralExp::getFieldIndex() in expression.c.

PATCH: 
Just copy int StructLiteralExp::getFieldIndex(Type *type, unsigned offset)
(line 3197) from D2 to D1. (Needs if(elements->dim){ ... } around the for
loop).

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Aug 13 2009
prev sibling parent d-bugmail puremagic.com writes:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2851


Walter Bright <bugzilla digitalmars.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|REOPENED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED



13:51:30 PDT ---
Fixed dmd 1.049

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Oct 13 2009