digitalmars.D.bugs - [Issue 2830] New: private attribute doesn't work for structs
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (31/31) Apr 10 2009 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2830
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (34/34) Apr 10 2009 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2830
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (6/6) Apr 10 2009 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2830
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (20/20) Apr 10 2009 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2830
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (6/17) Apr 11 2009 // Typo.
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (16/16) Apr 11 2009 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2830
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (7/7) Apr 12 2009 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2830
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (16/16) May 08 2011 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2830
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (12/12) Jan 23 2012 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2830
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (8/10) Jan 23 2012 Do you mean not visible or not accessible? At present, private seems to ...
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (6/6) Jan 23 2012 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2830
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (10/10) Sep 04 2012 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2830
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (12/12) Oct 17 2012 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2830
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2830 Summary: private attribute doesn't work for structs Product: D Version: 2.027 Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Keywords: accepts-invalid Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: DMD AssignedTo: bugzilla digitalmars.com ReportedBy: maxmo pochta.ru tmp1.d --- private struct TestStruct { int var; } --- tmp.d --- import tmp1; int main() { TestStruct s; s.var=0; return 0; } --- --
Apr 10 2009
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2830 gide nwawudu.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |313, 314 Summary|private attribute doesn't |private attribute doesn't |work for structs |work for | |structs/unions/classes Structs, unions, classes and variables can bypass the private attribute. Similar to BUG 313 and BUG 314, added dependancies. tmp1.d ------ private struct TestStruct { int var; } private union TestUnion { int var; } private class TestClass { int var; } private int var; tmp.d ----- import tmp1; void main() { TestStruct s; TestUnion u; auto c = new TestClass; s.var = var; // Fails s.var = a.var; // OK } --
Apr 10 2009
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2830 This is almost certainly a dup of BUG 1441. The same lack of privacy mechanism applies to all kinds of UDTs. It doesn't really have anything to do with BUG 313 or BUG 314. --
Apr 10 2009
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2830 smjg iname.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|2.027 |1.043 What is 'a'? That line doesn't seem to have anything to say. But this code, compiled with the same tmp1.d, has something to say: ---------- import tmp1; void main() { TestStruct s; TestUnion u; auto c = new TestClass; auto sv = s.var; auto uv = u.var; auto cv = c.var; auto v = var; } --
Apr 10 2009
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2830tmp.d ----- import tmp1; void main() { TestStruct s; TestUnion u; auto c = new TestClass; s.var = var; // Fails s.var = a.var; // OK// Typo. s.var = tmp1.var; //Compiles but shouldn't bug 314}Looks like a dup of bug 1440, my google-fu is weak. --
Apr 11 2009
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2830 maxmo pochta.ru changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- URL| |http://www.digitalmars.com/d | |/2.0/attribute.html#Protecti | |onAttribute Component|DMD |www.digitalmars.com Keywords|accepts-invalid |spec OS/Version|Windows |All Platform|PC |All ^^it's actually my google-fu. Changing to spec bug. Spec should be clarified, how protection attributes work in this case. --
Apr 11 2009
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2830 Discussion taken to: "The great inapplicable attribute debate" digitalmars.D:87915 http://www.digitalmars.com/webnews/newsgroups.php?art_group=digitalmars.D&article_id=87915 --
Apr 12 2009
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2830 Jonathan M Davis <jmdavisProg gmx.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jmdavisProg gmx.com Version|1.043 |D1 & D2 PDT --- This is a bug in both D1 and D2, so I'm marking it as such. TestStruct shouldn't even be constructable outside of tmp1.d. The question of allowing you to access its member variables is secondary. It looks like the struct itself is being left as public, when it should be private. Now, it's still a bug if you can access its private member variables, but you shouldn't even be able to construct it in the first place. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
May 08 2011
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2830 Walter Bright <bugzilla digitalmars.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords|spec | CC| |bugzilla digitalmars.com 00:36:23 PST --- It's not a spec bug. Private declarations should not be visible outside their module. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Jan 23 2012
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2830 PST ---It's not a spec bug. Private declarations should not be visible outside their module.Do you mean not visible or not accessible? At present, private seems to work like C++ in that it's _always_ visible but not accessible. It's included in overload sets too. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Jan 23 2012
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2830 11:25:49 PST --- I meant accessible. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Jan 23 2012
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2830 Walter Bright <bugzilla digitalmars.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|D1 & D2 |D1 22:17:05 PDT --- Fix for D2: https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/163 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Sep 04 2012
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2830 Oleg Kuporosov <Oleg.Kuporosov gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |Oleg.Kuporosov gmail.com 22:08:03 PDT --- Peter's fixes from "Comment 11" is verified in dmd2.061 alpha, but looks wasn't merged into D1 branch, so tests still failed in dmd1.076 alpha. This record wss issued against D1 so status is unchanged. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Oct 17 2012