digitalmars.D.bugs - [Issue 2460] New: Ref functions can't be template functions.
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (36/36) Nov 18 2008 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2460
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (12/12) Mar 27 2010 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2460
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (32/32) May 24 2010 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2460
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (28/28) Apr 23 2011 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2460
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (6/6) Apr 26 2011 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2460
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2460 Summary: Ref functions can't be template functions. Product: D Version: 2.020 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Keywords: rejects-valid Severity: minor Priority: P4 Component: DMD AssignedTo: bugzilla digitalmars.com ReportedBy: hskwk inter7.jp Ref functions can't be template functions I guess DMD parser failed to bind `ref' to ref functions if the template is written in function template syntax. It is not serious problem for me. real t; ref real f(S)(S rhs) { size_t tmp; return t; } template g(S) { ref real g(S rhs) { size_t tmp; return t; } } f(1.0); // variable f!(double).f.tmp only parameters or foreach declarations can be ref g(1.0) // no problem --
Nov 18 2008
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2460 Lars T. Kyllingstad <bugzilla kyllingen.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bugzilla kyllingen.net Severity|minor |major 11:27:51 PDT --- Raising importance, since operator overloading is now done with templated functions, and this will become a major pain in the long run. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Mar 27 2010
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2460 Masahiro Nakagawa <repeatedly gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |repeatedly gmail.com 08:59:21 PDT --- Today, I hit the similar problem. In the latest dmd, above code works but variadic version doesn't works. struct Foo { // works! I use this for workaround template foo(Args...) if (true) { ref Foo foo(Args args) { return this; } } // doesn't work. I want use this!! ref Foo foo(Args...)(Args args) if (true) { return this; } // works! ref Foo foo(Args...)(Args args) { return this; } } -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
May 24 2010
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2460 kennytm gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC| |kennytm gmail.com Resolution| |FIXED Looks like this has been fixed. All programs in this page compiles for me. -------- struct Foo { double x, y; ref double get(Args...)(Args args) if (args.length == 4) { return x; } } void main() { Foo f; f.get(4,5,6,7) = 6; assert(f.x == 6); } -------- Can we fix this std.complex bug then? "Some operators, such as opAssign and opOpAssign, should return by ref, but currently don't. This will be implemented as soon as DMD bug 2460 is fixed." -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Apr 23 2011
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2460 02:40:59 PDT --- Cool! I'll fix std.complex. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Apr 26 2011