www.digitalmars.com         C & C++   DMDScript  

digitalmars.D.bugs - [Issue 2203] New: typeof(class.template.foo) crashes compiler

reply d-bugmail puremagic.com writes:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2203

           Summary: typeof(class.template.foo) crashes compiler
           Product: D
           Version: 2.015
          Platform: PC
        OS/Version: Windows
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: DMD
        AssignedTo: bugzilla digitalmars.com
        ReportedBy: samukha voliacable.com


The following causes the compiler to crash (both 1.031 and 2.015):

class C
{
    template Bar()
    {
    }
}

static assert(!is(typeof(C.Bar.foo))); // Should pass


--
Jul 08 2008
next sibling parent d-bugmail puremagic.com writes:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2203


smjg iname.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |smjg iname.com
           Keywords|                            |ice-on-invalid-code





Though the code above is valid, I'm marking this as ice-on-invalid-code because
the root cause of it is that the compiler crashes trying to make sense of the
invalid typeof.

class C
{
    template Bar()
    {
    }
}

typeof(C.Bar.foo) quux;


--
Nov 24 2008
prev sibling next sibling parent d-bugmail puremagic.com writes:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2203


clugdbug yahoo.com.au changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|                            |patch
            Version|2.015                       |1.031






The segfault is caused by this line in DotIdExp::semantic(Scope *sc)
 in expression.c, line 5348 (in DMD 2.027).

    Type *t1b = e1->type->toBasetype();

If the expression was invalid, e1->type is null, so it segfaults.

Adding a line like:

if (!e1->type) {error("invalid expression"); return e1;}

before line 5348 is sufficient to avoid the segfault, and the original valid
code will compile without error. Not sure what the error message should be,
though.


--
Apr 02 2009
prev sibling next sibling parent d-bugmail puremagic.com writes:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2203






Fixed DMD2.028, not yet fixed in D1.


--
Apr 17 2009
prev sibling next sibling parent d-bugmail puremagic.com writes:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2203


clugdbug yahoo.com.au changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |dvdfrdmn users.sf.net





*** Bug 1340 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***


--
Apr 18 2009
prev sibling next sibling parent d-bugmail puremagic.com writes:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2203






This is actually the same as bug 1340. The typeof() isn't necessary. The error
message should be something like: "Uninstantiated templates have no members".

Reduced test case, ultimately from bug 1340:
struct C {
    template Bar()    {}
}
void main() {
    C.Bar.foo();
}


--
Apr 18 2009
prev sibling parent d-bugmail puremagic.com writes:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2203


bugzilla digitalmars.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED





Fixed dmd 1.044


--
May 02 2009