digitalmars.D.bugs - [Issue 2144] New: 'is' is defined to be the same as '==' for non-class and non-array types, but does not call opEquals
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (19/19) Jun 08 2008 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2144
- Robert Fraser (2/24) Jun 08 2008 I like the feature; so IMO it should be speced.
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (9/9) Jun 22 2008 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2144
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2144 Summary: 'is' is defined to be the same as '==' for non-class and non-array types, but does not call opEquals Product: D Version: 1.027 Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Keywords: spec Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: DMD AssignedTo: bugzilla digitalmars.com ReportedBy: jarrett.billingsley gmail.com Exactly what the topic says. So if you have two structs "a" and "b", "a is b" will perform a "primitive" bit-for-bit equality test, while "a == b" will call overloaded opEquals. Either the spec should mention this, or this is a bug. --
Jun 08 2008
d-bugmail puremagic.com wrote:http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2144 Summary: 'is' is defined to be the same as '==' for non-class and non-array types, but does not call opEquals Product: D Version: 1.027 Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Keywords: spec Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: DMD AssignedTo: bugzilla digitalmars.com ReportedBy: jarrett.billingsley gmail.com Exactly what the topic says. So if you have two structs "a" and "b", "a is b" will perform a "primitive" bit-for-bit equality test, while "a == b" will call overloaded opEquals. Either the spec should mention this, or this is a bug.I like the feature; so IMO it should be speced.
Jun 08 2008
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2144 bugzilla digitalmars.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED Fixed dmd 1.031 and 2.015 --
Jun 22 2008