www.digitalmars.com         C & C++   DMDScript  

digitalmars.D.bugs - [Issue 1709] New: Internal error: ..\ztc\cgcod.c 1522 when using -O

reply d-bugmail puremagic.com writes:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1709

           Summary: Internal error: ..\ztc\cgcod.c 1522  when using -O
           Product: D
           Version: 1.024
          Platform: PC
        OS/Version: Windows
            Status: NEW
          Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: DMD
        AssignedTo: bugzilla digitalmars.com
        ReportedBy: jascha mainia.de


introduced in 1.022.
unfortunately, i haven't been able to narrow it down to a simple testcase
(error appears on a >500kb source base). i will add it here when i can.


--
Dec 02 2007
next sibling parent d-bugmail puremagic.com writes:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1709


aaroncraelius gmail.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |aaroncraelius gmail.com




------- Comment #1 from aaroncraelius gmail.com  2007-12-06 11:40 -------
(In reply to comment #0)

 introduced in 1.022.
 unfortunately, i haven't been able to narrow it down to a simple testcase
 (error appears on a >500kb source base). i will add it here when i can.
 


I am getting a similar error when using -O but on line 1523
Internal error: ..\ztc\cgcod.c 1523

It occurs when compiling
http://svn.dsource.org/projects/sendero/trunk/sendero/xml/XPath.d using -O
which btw was generated by Jascha Wetzel's Apaged parser generator.


--
Dec 06 2007
prev sibling next sibling parent d-bugmail puremagic.com writes:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1709


Don <clugdbug yahoo.com.au> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |sjguy cs.unc.edu




--- Comment #2 from Don <clugdbug yahoo.com.au>  2009-06-02 16:31:01 PDT ---
*** Issue 1981 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Jun 02 2009
prev sibling next sibling parent d-bugmail puremagic.com writes:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1709


Don <clugdbug yahoo.com.au> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |INVALID




--- Comment #3 from Don <clugdbug yahoo.com.au>  2009-07-10 00:09:31 PDT ---
Almost two years without a test case, time to close it. Reopen if a test case
appears.

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Jul 10 2009
prev sibling next sibling parent d-bugmail puremagic.com writes:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1709


Sobirari Muhomori <maxmo pochta.ru> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Resolution|INVALID                     |LATER




--- Comment #4 from Sobirari Muhomori <maxmo pochta.ru>  2009-07-10 04:50:02
PDT ---
I think LATER is a better resolution. Testcase is here, it's just too big.

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Jul 10 2009
prev sibling next sibling parent d-bugmail puremagic.com writes:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1709


Brad Roberts <braddr puremagic.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |braddr puremagic.com
         Resolution|LATER                       |INVALID




--- Comment #5 from Brad Roberts <braddr puremagic.com>  2009-07-10 10:29:33
PDT ---
Changed back to invalid.  For it to become valid, it needs a reasonably small
reproduction case.  If you want to help, actually help -- don't just go
changing status because you don't like it.

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Jul 10 2009
prev sibling parent d-bugmail puremagic.com writes:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1709





--- Comment #6 from Don <clugdbug yahoo.com.au>  2009-07-13 02:26:48 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #5)

 Changed back to invalid.  For it to become valid, it needs a reasonably small
 reproduction case.  If you want to help, actually help -- don't just go
 changing status because you don't like it.


(In reply to comment #4)

 I think LATER is a better resolution. Testcase is here, it's just too big.


Test case is NOT here. It's not an issue of how big it is. The file linked to
contains imports to other modules, which are not provided.  Also, it's a link
to a repository, which has probably changed since the bug report was made.

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Jul 13 2009