digitalmars.D.bugs - [Issue 1470] New: "extern (C)" inside function crashes gdc
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (28/28) Sep 02 2007 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1470
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (23/23) Sep 04 2007 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1470
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1470 Summary: "extern (C)" inside function crashes gdc Product: D Version: 2.004 Platform: Macintosh OS/Version: Mac OS X Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: DMD AssignedTo: bugzilla digitalmars.com ReportedBy: u.singer gmx.net Hi, I am using the D compiler on Mac OS X 10.4 ("gdc-0.24-mac-10.4.dmg" from sourceforge.net). The following code crashes my gdc: long atol (string str) { extern (C) long atoll(char *nptr); return atoll(cast(char *)(str)); } When running gdc, it says: crash.d: In function ‘atol’: crash.d:5: internal compiler error: Bus error Please submit a full bug report ... If I put the "extern (C)" declaration out of the function, the bus error goes away. --
Sep 02 2007
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1470 u.singer gmx.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|2.004 |1.020 ------- Comment #1 from u.singer gmx.net 2007-09-04 13:41 ------- As an issue tracker newbie, I first got the "Component" & "Version" fields wrong. Meantime, I corrected the "Version" to 1.020 following the output of the "gdc -v" command: Using built-in specs. Target: powerpc-apple-darwin8 Configured with: /usr/local/staging/r24rc1/gcc-5363/build/obj/src/configure --disable-checking -enable-werror --prefix=/usr --mandir=/share/man --enable-languages=c,c++,d --program-transform-name=/^[cg][^.-]*$/s/$/-4.0/ --with-gxx-include-dir=/include/c++/4.0.0 --with-slibdir=/usr/lib --build=i686-apple-darwin8 --program-prefix= --host=powerpc-apple-darwin8 --target=powerpc-apple-darwin8 Thread model: posix gcc version 4.0.1 (Apple Computer, Inc. build 5363) (gdc 0.24, using dmd 1.020) Also, I gained the impression that the actual failing component is the gcc backend, not gdc itself. Nevertheless, the builders of gdc / dmd will be far better capable than myself of determining the cause of the crash... --
Sep 04 2007