digitalmars.D.bugs - [Issue 1361] New: DMD 2.002 introduced bug:array initializers are not allowed?
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (21/21) Jul 22 2007 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1361
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (6/6) Jul 23 2007 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1361
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (5/11) Jul 23 2007 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1361
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (6/6) Jul 23 2007 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1361
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (7/7) Jul 23 2007 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1361
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (5/5) Jul 23 2007 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1361
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1361 Summary: DMD 2.002 introduced bug:array initializers are not allowed? Product: D Version: 2.002 Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: DMD AssignedTo: bugzilla digitalmars.com ReportedBy: zhuzhenping gmail.com int[2][3]myarray = [5,5,5,5,5,5]; int main(char[][] args) { return 0; } Gives: “ Error: too many initializers, 6, for array[3]” --
Jul 22 2007
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1361 ------- Comment #1 from ibisbasenji gmail.com 2007-07-23 08:42 ------- ...did that ever work? int[2][3] myarray = [[5,5],[5,5],[5,5]]; -- Chris Nicholson-Sauls --
Jul 23 2007
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1361 ------- Comment #2 from zhuzhenping gmail.com 2007-07-23 19:02 ------- (In reply to comment #1)...did that ever work? int[2][3] myarray = [[5,5],[5,5],[5,5]]; -- Chris Nicholson-SaulsYes,Thank you,it works. --
Jul 23 2007
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1361 zhuzhenping gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --
Jul 23 2007
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1361 zhuzhenping gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED --
Jul 23 2007
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1361 ------- Comment #3 from bugzilla digitalmars.com 2007-07-23 19:35 ------- The original snippet should never have compiled, it wasn't a compiler bug. Although the code is valid C, it is not valid D. --
Jul 23 2007