• via Digitalmars-d-bugs (24/24) Aug 22 2014 https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13358

via Digitalmars-d-bugs <digitalmars-d-bugs puremagic.com> writes:

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13358

          Issue ID: 13358
           Summary: Comments in core.demangle refer to TypeIdent,
                    TypeClass, etc. as LNames when they are parsed as
                    QualifiedNames
           Product: D
           Version: unspecified
          Hardware: All
                OS: All
            Status: NEW
          Severity: enhancement
          Priority: P1
         Component: druntime
          Assignee: nobody puremagic.com
          Reporter: blah38621 gmail.com

As stated in the subject, core.demangle's internal comments refer to TypeIdent, 
TypeClass, TypeName, TypeEnum, and TypeTypedef as being LName values, but it 
parsed them as QualifiedName values. And, as long as someone is messing with 
the comments in core.demangle, it would probably be a good idea to split up the 
comment describing the structure of a TypeFunction to have only the part the 
method it's above actually uses, and to move the rest to the methods that 
actually parse that piece. This would make it consistent with the rest of the 
style used in core.demangle.

--