www.digitalmars.com         C & C++   DMDScript  

digitalmars.D.bugs - [Issue 1104] New: CodeView: char is marked 0x20 (T_UCHAR) instead of 0x10 (T_CHAR)

reply d-bugmail puremagic.com writes:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1104

           Summary: CodeView: char is marked 0x20 (T_UCHAR) instead of 0x10
                    (T_CHAR)
           Product: D
           Version: 1.010
          Platform: PC
        OS/Version: Windows
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: DMD
        AssignedTo: bugzilla digitalmars.com
        ReportedBy: jascha mainia.de


char is marked in CV data as type 0x20 T_UCHAR - should be 0x10 T_CHAR


--
Apr 06 2007
next sibling parent d-bugmail puremagic.com writes:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1104






better: mark char as 0x70 T_RCHAR (real char)

byte is 0x10 T_CHAR
ubyte is 0x20 T_UCHAR
therefore char shouldn't be any of these two


--
Apr 06 2007
prev sibling next sibling parent d-bugmail puremagic.com writes:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1104






this problem extends to wchar and dchar with the corresponding 16 and 32bit CV
types


--
Apr 19 2007
prev sibling next sibling parent d-bugmail puremagic.com writes:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1104






I can use T_WCHAR (x71) for wchar, but what do I use for dchar?


--
Jun 29 2007
prev sibling next sibling parent d-bugmail puremagic.com writes:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1104






i'd suggest a static array of 2 T_WCHARs. alternatively, 0x78 seems to be
undefined...


--
Jun 30 2007
prev sibling parent d-bugmail puremagic.com writes:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1104






T_RCHAR and T_WCHAR are now done, but not the dchar one.


--
Jul 01 2007