digitalmars.D.bugs - [Issue 1082] New: The .offsetof property yields a signed int, a size_t would be more appropriate
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (36/36) Mar 27 2007 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1082
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (9/9) Apr 11 2007 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1082
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1082 Summary: The .offsetof property yields a signed int, a size_t would be more appropriate Product: D Version: 1.010 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: DMD AssignedTo: bugzilla digitalmars.com ReportedBy: guido grumpy-cat.com The .offsetof property yields a signed int value, an unsigned int like size_t would be more appropriate. Also the exact type yielded by .offsetof should be documented in the Portability Guide of the documentation. The types yielded by .length, .sizeof, and .alignof are specified there. /* dmd -w -O test.d ./test size_t type = uint sizeof type = uint alignof type = uint offsetof type = int */ import std.stdio; struct foo { int bar; } void main() { writefln("size_t type = ", typeid(size_t)); writefln("sizeof type = ", typeid(typeof(foo.bar.sizeof))); writefln("alignof type = ", typeid(typeof(foo.bar.alignof))); writefln("offsetof type = ", typeid(typeof(foo.bar.offsetof))); } --
Mar 27 2007
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1082 bugzilla digitalmars.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED ------- Comment #1 from bugzilla digitalmars.com 2007-04-11 22:02 ------- Fixed dmd 1.011 --
Apr 11 2007