digitalmars.D.bugs - [Issue 10623] New: destructor not called for function argument if constructing another argument throws
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (32/32) Jul 12 2013 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10623
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (11/11) Jul 12 2013 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10623
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (20/22) Jul 12 2013 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10623
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10623 Summary: destructor not called for function argument if constructing another argument throws Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: DMD AssignedTo: nobody puremagic.com ReportedBy: andrei erdani.com PDT --- Consider: import std.stdio; struct S1 { this(int) { writeln("constructed"); } ~this() { writeln("destroyed"); } } struct S2 { this(int) { throw new Exception("a"); } } void fun(S1, S2, S1) {} void main() { fun(S1(2), S2(2), S1(2)); } Running this code will create an object of type S1 that is never destroyed. This is somewhat related to http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9704, just there's no postblit. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Jul 12 2013
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10623 Maxim Fomin <maxim maxim-fomin.ru> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |maxim maxim-fomin.ru --- I think this can be marked as a dup because it is a particular situation of essentially the same case described in issue 9704. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Jul 12 2013
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10623 monarchdodra gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC| |monarchdodra gmail.com See Also| |http://d.puremagic.com/issu | |es/show_bug.cgi?id=9704 Resolution| |DUPLICATEI think this can be marked as a dup because it is a particular situation of essentially the same case described in issue 9704.This indeed a more generically worded description, but essentially, the same thing. Also, (since links never hurt), this issue was also discussed recently in learn: http://forum.dlang.org/thread/20130628005448.00000969 unknown?page=2 *** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of issue 9704 *** -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Jul 12 2013