digitalmars.D.bugs - [Issue 10153] New: Beta releases should all have unique names
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (28/28) May 23 2013 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10153
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (11/11) May 23 2013 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10153
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10153 Summary: Beta releases should all have unique names Product: D Version: unspecified Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: installer AssignedTo: nobody puremagic.com ReportedBy: jmdavisProg gmx.com PDT --- This has been brought up several times (including at dconf 2013), but nothing has happened with it yet, so I figured that I should create an enhancement request for it. Right now, all dmd beta releases have the same name. This makes it very difficult to determine where any particular beta zip file fits into the string of betas or even which release of the compiler the beta is for. They should all have unique names - something like dmd.2.063beta1.zip, dmd.2.063beta2.zip, dmd.2.064beta1.zip. The exact naming scheme isn't necessarily all that important, but it should have the name of the release that it's a beta for as well as a number indicating which beta it is in the string of betas for that release. Ideally, dmd itself would report that version as well so that it's clear which version of dmd you have installed. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
May 23 2013
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10153 Jacob Carlborg <doob me.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |doob me.com If we have a naming scheme looking like dmd.<whatever> it will be automatically compatible with DVM :) -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
May 23 2013