digitalmars.D.bugs - [Issue 10107] New: Allow to store "newed" class and struct instances in TLS
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (25/25) May 17 2013 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10107
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (17/17) May 17 2013 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10107
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10107 Summary: Allow to store "newed" class and struct instances in TLS Product: D Version: unspecified Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: DMD AssignedTo: nobody puremagic.com ReportedBy: code dawg.eu class Foo { } Foo foo = new Foo(); ---- This is a followup of bug 9941. NB: https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/1724#issuecomment-15456975 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
May 17 2013
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10107 Igor Stepanov <wazar.leollone yahoo.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |wazar.leollone yahoo.com 16:34:34 PDT --- Same http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10108 I think. This is conceptual question: Can reference types be thread local? If we'll find the way: we can do class literals, array literals and pointers thread local. By the way: int* global_ptr = [1,2,3].ptr; //same trouble I think, we must reject all mutable non-shared reference literals. And move to reject all non-mutable literals -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
May 17 2013