• d-bugmail puremagic.com (17/17) Aug 22 2006 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=306
• Derek Parnell (10/30) Aug 22 2006 This is the sort of thing I was worried about too. It is quite feasible
• d-bugmail puremagic.com (9/9) Sep 02 2006 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=306
• Thomas Kuehne (12/17) Sep 03 2006 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

d-bugmail puremagic.com writes:

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=306

           Summary: dmd 165 breaks existing code
           Product: D
           Version: 0.165
          Platform: PC
        OS/Version: Windows
            Status: NEW
          Severity: critical
          Priority: P1
         Component: DMD
        AssignedTo: bugzilla digitalmars.com
        ReportedBy: someidiot earthlink.net


existing code that was legal with dmd.164 does not compile with 165.

void append (char[] content);
void append (char[] delegate());

these two cause an ambiguity in dmd.165 whereas they did not in dmd.164


-- 

Derek Parnell <derek nomail.afraid.org> writes:

On Wed, 23 Aug 2006 05:25:24 +0000 (UTC), d-bugmail puremagic.com wrote:

 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=306
 
            Summary: dmd 165 breaks existing code
            Product: D
            Version: 0.165
           Platform: PC
         OS/Version: Windows
             Status: NEW
           Severity: critical
           Priority: P1
          Component: DMD
         AssignedTo: bugzilla digitalmars.com
         ReportedBy: someidiot earthlink.net
 
 existing code that was legal with dmd.164 does not compile with 165.
 
 void append (char[] content);
 void append (char[] delegate());
 
 these two cause an ambiguity in dmd.165 whereas they did not in dmd.164

This is the sort of thing I was worried about too. It is quite feasible
that 'append' might want to behave differently depending on whether the
argument is a string or a delegate.

-- 
Derek
(skype: derek.j.parnell)
Melbourne, Australia
"Down with mediocrity!"
23/08/2006 4:34:07 PM

d-bugmail puremagic.com writes:

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=306


bugzilla digitalmars.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED





Fixed 0.166


-- 

Thomas Kuehne <thomas-dloop kuehne.cn> writes:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

d-bugmail puremagic.com schrieb am 2006-08-23:
 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=306

 existing code that was legal with dmd.164 does not compile with 165.

 void append (char[] content);
 void append (char[] delegate());

 these two cause an ambiguity in dmd.165 whereas they did not in dmd.164

Added to DStress as
http://dstress.kuehne.cn/run/d/delegate_19_A.d
http://dstress.kuehne.cn/run/d/delegate_19_B.d

Thomas


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iD8DBQFE+pidLK5blCcjpWoRAluEAJwPde8FX6wi8XBP902v1kPIL7C9/wCeLdw8
41DgnsCwOyIfWt5nazJXqIY=
=0gis
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----