www.digitalmars.com         C & C++   DMDScript  

digitalmars.D.bugs - [Issue 201] New: the source for etc.gamma is not in the download

reply d-bugmail puremagic.com writes:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=201

           Summary: the source for etc.gamma  is not in the download
           Product: D
           Version: 0.160
          Platform: PC
        OS/Version: Windows
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: Phobos
        AssignedTo: bugzilla digitalmars.com
        ReportedBy: clugdbug yahoo.com.au


..but it's in the makefile, and it's compiled into phobos.lib. It's also
mentioned in the comments in std.math, so I presume it's supposed to be
included in etc (though maybe not in the phobos lib).
Currently the only thing it does it make it difficult to build phobos!

Since I wrote this code, I felt obliged to tidy it up a little bit. You can get
it from:

http://www.dsource.org/projects/mathextra/browser/trunk/mathextra/etcgamma.d

(change 'mathextra.etcgamma' to 'etc.gamma').
All references to the file 'realtest.d' should be removed from the makefiles,
it was only used during development.


--
Jun 16 2006
next sibling parent d-bugmail puremagic.com writes:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=201






Seems the v0.161 distribution contains gamma.d, but the file still refers to
realtest. 

Commenting the import at the top of etc/gamma.d solves the problem, and Phobos
now builds out of the box!


--
Jun 23 2006
prev sibling parent d-bugmail puremagic.com writes:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=201


clugdbug yahoo.com.au changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED





I'm changing this to FIXED, since the original problem is gone. There's a new,
trivial bug (the import of module realtest), but it's probably better to file
that seperately.


--
Oct 10 2006