• Regan Heath (11/11) Jun 14 2004 On http://www.digitalmars.com/d/arrays.html
• Stewart Gordon (9/12) Jun 15 2004 "Inefficient" is normally unhyphenated, as confirmed by both OneLook and...
• Regan Heath (5/11) Jun 15 2004 :) Oops.

Regan Heath <regan netwin.co.nz> writes:

On http://www.digitalmars.com/d/arrays.html

"Resizing a dynamic array is a relatively expensive operation. So, while 
the following method of filling an array:

..example..

will work, it will be efficient."


Should read:

"will work, it will be in-efficient."

yes?

Regan.

-- 
Using M2, Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/

Stewart Gordon <smjg_1998 yahoo.com> writes:

Regan Heath wrote:

<snip>
 Should read:
 
 "will work, it will be in-efficient."

"Inefficient" is normally unhyphenated, as confirmed by both OneLook and 
Google.

Stewart.

-- 
My e-mail is valid but not my primary mailbox, aside from its being the 
unfortunate victim of intensive mail-bombing at the moment.  Please keep 
replies on the 'group where everyone may benefit.

Regan Heath <regan netwin.co.nz> writes:

On Tue, 15 Jun 2004 11:57:57 +0100, Stewart Gordon <smjg_1998 yahoo.com> 
wrote:
 <snip>
 Should read:

 "will work, it will be in-efficient."

 "Inefficient" is normally unhyphenated, as confirmed by both OneLook and 
 Google.

:) Oops.

-- 
Using M2, Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/