• h3r3tic (20/21) Dec 26 2004 This code contains an error, operator !== should be used instead of !=
• Thomas Kuehne (12/12) Dec 26 2004 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
• Simon Buchan (3/24) Dec 28 2004 I was under the impression that the identifier token === (and its negati...
• h3r3tic (5/39) Dec 28 2004 Not replaced. They're alternatives. Anyway it was not a typo in the code...
• =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Anders_F_Bj=F6rklund?= (5/7) Dec 28 2004 Shouldn't that be "isnt" ? (since "isn't" is a keyword nightmare)

h3r3tic <foo bar.baz> writes:

This code contains an error, operator !== should be used instead of != 
in the findNode() function (problem doesn't show up then)
Yet dmd.109 reports something else ;)

 Assertion failure: 'ident' on line 611 in file 'dsymbol.c'


interface INode
{
	INode		owner();
}


class BasicNode : INode
{
	INode findNode()
	{
		foreach(INode c; m_children)
			if (c.owner != this) continue;
		return null;
	}
	
	INode[]	m_children;
}

The result is exactly the same if the owner() function is implemented in 
the BasicNode class.

"Thomas Kuehne" <thomas-dloop kuehne.cn> writes:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Added to DStress as
http://dstress.kuehne.cn/nocompile/bug_dsymbol_611_A.d
http://dstress.kuehne.cn/nocompile/bug_dsymbol_611_B.d
http://dstress.kuehne.cn/compile/bug_dsymbol_611_C.d

Thomas
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iD8DBQFBzyyD3w+/yD4P9tIRArJIAJ4l5IMXQbKhOR7eYrpDK199E/6JjQCfbw8L
C2pgWuPJStEt9MyWk1Jd4JU=
=EaSw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

"Simon Buchan" <talk n.g> writes:

On Sun, 26 Dec 2004 16:24:08 +0100, h3r3tic <foo bar.baz> wrote:

 This code contains an error, operator !== should be used instead of !=
 in the findNode() function (problem doesn't show up then)
 Yet dmd.109 reports something else ;)

  > Assertion failure: 'ident' on line 611 in file 'dsymbol.c'


 interface INode
 {
 	INode		owner();
 }


 class BasicNode : INode
 {
 	INode findNode()
 	{
 		foreach(INode c; m_children)
 			if (c.owner != this) continue;
 		return null;
 	}
 	
 	INode[]	m_children;
 }

 The result is exactly the same if the owner() function is implemented in
 the BasicNode class.

I was under the impression that the identifier token === (and its negative !==)
were replaced by 'is' (and !(foo is bar))

h3r3tic <foo bar.baz> writes:

Simon Buchan wrote:
 On Sun, 26 Dec 2004 16:24:08 +0100, h3r3tic <foo bar.baz> wrote:
 
 This code contains an error, operator !== should be used instead of !=
 in the findNode() function (problem doesn't show up then)
 Yet dmd.109 reports something else ;)

  > Assertion failure: 'ident' on line 611 in file 'dsymbol.c'


 interface INode
 {
     INode        owner();
 }


 class BasicNode : INode
 {
     INode findNode()
     {
         foreach(INode c; m_children)
             if (c.owner != this) continue;
         return null;
     }
     
     INode[]    m_children;
 }

 The result is exactly the same if the owner() function is implemented in
 the BasicNode class.

 
 I was under the impression that the identifier token === (and its 
 negative !==)
 were replaced by 'is' (and !(foo is bar))

Not replaced. They're alternatives. Anyway it was not a typo in the code 
so the '=' versus '==' versus '===' problem doesn't apply here ;)
Anyways, why hasn't the 'a aint b' operator been adopted instead of '!(a 
is b)' ? Maybe I should add it to my preprocessor :)

=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Anders_F_Bj=F6rklund?= <afb algonet.se> writes:

h3r3tic wrote:

 Anyways, why hasn't the 'a aint b' operator been adopted instead of '!(a 
 is b)' ? Maybe I should add it to my preprocessor :)

Shouldn't that be "isnt" ? (since "isn't" is a keyword nightmare)

I'm not really sure that D needs any more english operators, though...
(and there are plenty before that one: "unless", "and", "or", "not")

--anders