digitalmars.D - anyone using msgpackrpc-d ? it's currently broken and doesn't seem
- Timothee Cour via Digitalmars-d (6/6) Jun 12 2017 any help on this would be most welcome:
- Domain (2/8) Jun 12 2017 http://forum.rejectedsoftware.com/groups/rejectedsoftware.vibed/thread/2...
- Timothee Cour via Digitalmars-d (5/15) Jun 12 2017 Thanks for the link; last answer was from 2014, and doesn't look like
- Atila Neves (3/9) Jun 13 2017 Thrift?
- Yawniek (4/10) Jun 14 2017 Msgpack rpc with vibe.d works. We used it.
- David Nadlinger (11/13) Jun 14 2017 I don't think Thrift is fundamentally much different in
- Timothee Cour via Digitalmars-d (6/21) Jun 14 2017 you mean with msgpackrpc-d? If so, it works, until you run into
- Poyeyo (6/12) Jun 15 2017 An alternative, and quite fast in C++ according to one of the
any help on this would be most welcome: https://github.com/msgpack-rpc/msgpack-rpc-d/issues/16 Unfortunately I find the RPC support in D lacking. Having a good RPC integration for D is key for production use of D where one wants to integrate with other existing services (that could be written in other languages for eg)
Jun 12 2017
On Monday, 12 June 2017 at 18:12:38 UTC, Timothee Cour wrote:any help on this would be most welcome: https://github.com/msgpack-rpc/msgpack-rpc-d/issues/16 Unfortunately I find the RPC support in D lacking. Having a good RPC integration for D is key for production use of D where one wants to integrate with other existing services (that could be written in other languages for eg)http://forum.rejectedsoftware.com/groups/rejectedsoftware.vibed/thread/21312/
Jun 12 2017
Thanks for the link; last answer was from 2014, and doesn't look like the problem was close to being solved. Any help with how to address this issue would be really appreciated! On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 6:35 PM, Domain via Digitalmars-d <digitalmars-d puremagic.com> wrote:On Monday, 12 June 2017 at 18:12:38 UTC, Timothee Cour wrote:any help on this would be most welcome: https://github.com/msgpack-rpc/msgpack-rpc-d/issues/16 Unfortunately I find the RPC support in D lacking. Having a good RPC integration for D is key for production use of D where one wants to integrate with other existing services (that could be written in other languages for eg)http://forum.rejectedsoftware.com/groups/rejectedsoftware.vibed/thread/21312/
Jun 12 2017
On Monday, 12 June 2017 at 18:12:38 UTC, Timothee Cour wrote:any help on this would be most welcome: https://github.com/msgpack-rpc/msgpack-rpc-d/issues/16 Unfortunately I find the RPC support in D lacking. Having a good RPC integration for D is key for production use of D where one wants to integrate with other existing services (that could be written in other languages for eg)Thrift? Atila
Jun 13 2017
On Monday, 12 June 2017 at 18:12:38 UTC, Timothee Cour wrote:any help on this would be most welcome: https://github.com/msgpack-rpc/msgpack-rpc-d/issues/16 Unfortunately I find the RPC support in D lacking. Having a good RPC integration for D is key for production use of D where one wants to integrate with other existing services (that could be written in other languages for eg)Msgpack rpc with vibe.d works. We used it. Its extremely fast, youll never get that speed with thrift. But also annoying, ghus we switched towards http + asdf
Jun 14 2017
On Wednesday, 14 June 2017 at 19:55:49 UTC, Yawniek wrote:Msgpack rpc with vibe.d works. We used it. Its extremely fast, youll never get that speed with thrift.I don't think Thrift is fundamentally much different in performance than MessagePack, see e.g. https://github.com/thekvs/cpp-serializers. Do you have data to suggest otherwise? (I of course originally wrote Thrift/D, but that was long enough ago that I like to think I'm not particularly biased either way.) As for the performance of the RPC server, I'd think that just hooking vibe.d sockets into Thrift should give you similar performance to msgpack-rpc/vibe.d. — David
Jun 14 2017
Msgpack rpc with vibe.d works. We used it.you mean with msgpackrpc-d? If so, it works, until you run into https://github.com/msgpack-rpc/msgpack-rpc-d/issues/16 (when server sends >= 4090 bytes, client hangs forever).we switched towards http + asdfnot sure what asdf is? On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 4:42 PM, David Nadlinger via Digitalmars-d <digitalmars-d puremagic.com> wrote:On Wednesday, 14 June 2017 at 19:55:49 UTC, Yawniek wrote:Msgpack rpc with vibe.d works. We used it. Its extremely fast, youll never get that speed with thrift.I don't think Thrift is fundamentally much different in performance than MessagePack, see e.g. https://github.com/thekvs/cpp-serializers. Do you have data to suggest otherwise? (I of course originally wrote Thrift/D, but that was long enough ago that I like to think I'm not particularly biased either way.) As for the performance of the RPC server, I'd think that just hooking vibe.d sockets into Thrift should give you similar performance to msgpack-rpc/vibe.d. — David
Jun 14 2017
On Thursday, 15 June 2017 at 04:14:22 UTC, Timothee Cour wrote:not sure what asdf is?I assume its this. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advanced_Scientific_Data_Format A file format with a YAML header followed by binary or ascii data. Human readable in design but still has binary/ascii data. Technically its just a block based binary file format but they replaced the header with a human readable header, instead of a binary header.
Jun 15 2017
On Thursday, 15 June 2017 at 04:14:22 UTC, Timothee Cour wrote:Probably this: https://github.com/tamediadigital/asdfMsgpack rpc with vibe.d works. We used it.you mean with msgpackrpc-d? If so, it works, until you run into https://github.com/msgpack-rpc/msgpack-rpc-d/issues/16 (when server sends >= 4090 bytes, client hangs forever).we switched towards http + asdfnot sure what asdf is?
Jun 15 2017
On Monday, 12 June 2017 at 18:12:38 UTC, Timothee Cour wrote:any help on this would be most welcome: https://github.com/msgpack-rpc/msgpack-rpc-d/issues/16 Unfortunately I find the RPC support in D lacking. Having a good RPC integration for D is key for production use of D where one wants to integrate with other existing services (that could be written in other languages for eg)An alternative, and quite fast in C++ according to one of the answers here, is Cap'n'proto. There is a D implementation here: https://github.com/ThomasBrixLarsen/capnproto-dlang Regards,
Jun 15 2017