• Martin Nowak (2/2) Mar 21 2015 Sharing a useful tool of mine.
• Suliman (2/4) Mar 22 2015 Could you explain why pure vibed do not good for static files?
• "Ozan =?UTF-8?B?U8O8ZWwi?= <ozan.sueel gmail.com> (8/13) Mar 22 2015 When I get it right,
• Martin Nowak (8/9) Mar 22 2015 It's mainly a replacement for `python -m SimpleHTTPServer`, and
• Brad Anderson (3/12) Mar 22 2015 Nice to have this. It always felt dirty using SimpleHTTPServer to
• Walter Bright (4/12) Mar 22 2015 If you could write a brief article about it, that would be great! I thin...
• Martin Nowak (4/8) Mar 23 2015 An article would exceed the amount of code I wrote, but I did read up

Martin Nowak <code+news.digitalmars dawg.eu> writes:

Sharing a useful tool of mine.

http://code.dlang.org/packages/serve

"Suliman" <evermind live.ru> writes:

On Sunday, 22 March 2015 at 03:26:14 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
 Sharing a useful tool of mine.

 http://code.dlang.org/packages/serve


Could you explain why pure vibed do not good for static files?

"Ozan =?UTF-8?B?U8O8ZWwi?= <ozan.sueel gmail.com> writes:

On Sunday, 22 March 2015 at 07:11:05 UTC, Suliman wrote:
 On Sunday, 22 March 2015 at 03:26:14 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
 Sharing a useful tool of mine.

 http://code.dlang.org/packages/serve


 Could you explain why pure vibed do not good for static files?

When I get it right,
* it's based on vibe.d
* but has a different usage (simplifies handling of 
html-files/folders)
(read http://code.dlang.org/packages/serve -> usage)

I like. It's a great idea.

Regards, Ozan

"Martin Nowak" <code dawg.eu> writes:

On Sunday, 22 March 2015 at 07:11:05 UTC, Suliman wrote:
 Could you explain why pure vibed do not good for static files?

It's mainly a replacement for `python -m SimpleHTTPServer`, and 
is just a very small tool around vibe.d's serveStaticFiles, which 
does a good job at serving static files and works much more 
reliable than the python variant.
https://github.com/MartinNowak/serve/blob/master/source/app.d

I also added index file serving to vibe.d recently.
https://github.com/rejectedsoftware/vibe.d/pull/902

"Brad Anderson" <eco gnuk.net> writes:

On Sunday, 22 March 2015 at 10:33:38 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
 On Sunday, 22 March 2015 at 07:11:05 UTC, Suliman wrote:
 Could you explain why pure vibed do not good for static files?

 It's mainly a replacement for `python -m SimpleHTTPServer`, and 
 is just a very small tool around vibe.d's serveStaticFiles, 
 which does a good job at serving static files and works much 
 more reliable than the python variant.
 https://github.com/MartinNowak/serve/blob/master/source/app.d

 I also added index file serving to vibe.d recently.
 https://github.com/rejectedsoftware/vibe.d/pull/902

Nice to have this. It always felt dirty using SimpleHTTPServer to 
test dlang.org locally.

Walter Bright <newshound2 digitalmars.com> writes:

On 3/22/2015 3:33 AM, Martin Nowak wrote:
 On Sunday, 22 March 2015 at 07:11:05 UTC, Suliman wrote:
 Could you explain why pure vibed do not good for static files?

 It's mainly a replacement for `python -m SimpleHTTPServer`, and is just a very
 small tool around vibe.d's serveStaticFiles, which does a good job at serving
 static files and works much more reliable than the python variant.
 https://github.com/MartinNowak/serve/blob/master/source/app.d

 I also added index file serving to vibe.d recently.
 https://github.com/rejectedsoftware/vibe.d/pull/902

If you could write a brief article about it, that would be great! I think 
there's a lot of potential for D in that space, and having such articles will 
help promulgate the idea.

Martin Nowak <code+news.digitalmars dawg.eu> writes:

On 03/22/2015 08:56 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
 
 If you could write a brief article about it, that would be great! I
 think there's a lot of potential for D in that space, and having such
 articles will help promulgate the idea.

An article would exceed the amount of code I wrote, but I did read up
how to serve static files really fast, that might make for an
interesting article.