www.digitalmars.com         C & C++   DMDScript  

digitalmars.D.announce - New release v0.5 of the D bindings for SAP NetWeaver RFC SDK

reply Kai Nacke <kai redstar.de> writes:
Hi!

I made a new release of sapnwrfc-d, the D bindings for the SAP 
NetWeaver RFC SDK.

Included are the following changes:

   - New bindings for basic decimal arithmetic (sapdecf.h)
   - A lot of fixes to the bindings and new, automatically 
generated bindings
   - New example applications
     computeday: This is an example of a simple RFC call
     repotool: This utility displays the metadata for a RFC

The included set of example applications show how easy it is to 
call an RFC. To use the library just add a dependency to your 
dub.json/dub.sdl file or clone the source at 
https://github.com/redstar/sapnwrfc-d.

Regards,
Kai
Oct 08 2017
parent reply Martin Nowak <code+news.digitalmars dawg.eu> writes:
On 10/08/2017 12:59 PM, Kai Nacke wrote:

 The included set of example applications show how easy it is to call an
 RFC. To use the library just add a dependency to your dub.json/dub.sdl
 file or clone the source at https://github.com/redstar/sapnwrfc-d.


Thanks, examples are nice for packages.

Wondering a little about the std. usage, as it seems very unlikely to
ever become standardized.
Why not just use sap. or netweaver. as top level package?

Also I can recommend at least some basic ddoc comments, it's really
trivial to use ddox to get some nice documentation, e.g. see
https://github.com/MartinNowak/bloom.

If you use x:ddoxFilterArgs without "--only-documented", it should even
work for undocumented functions.

-Martin
Oct 10 2017
parent Kai Nacke <kai redstar.de> writes:
Hi Martin!

On Tuesday, 10 October 2017 at 13:25:43 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:

 Thanks, examples are nice for packages.


Examples are a good way to check that the definitions are really 
working. My first version was really buggy.


 Wondering a little about the std. usage, as it seems very 
 unlikely to
 ever become standardized.
 Why not just use sap. or netweaver. as top level package?


It was just of a lack of a better name. Thinking about it I like 
the "netweaver." package name.


 Also I can recommend at least some basic ddoc comments, it's 
 really trivial to use ddox to get some nice documentation, e.g. 
 see https://github.com/MartinNowak/bloom.

 If you use x:ddoxFilterArgs without "--only-documented", it 
 should even work for undocumented functions.


Yeah, documentation is a bit weak. Currently, there is not much 
more than the official C API (for which you can download the 
documentation) with some D tuning. But I now start adding more 
functions and I will consider your hint.

Thanks for your feedback!

Regards,
Kai
Oct 17 2017