• Andrei Alexandrescu (9/9) Aug 24 2012 Hi everybody,
• Simen Kjaeraas (5/12) Aug 24 2012 Congratulations!
• Dmitry Olshansky (11/18) Aug 24 2012 It would be great if we can get help from compiler hackers, as I've
• Andrei Alexandrescu (4/22) Aug 24 2012 I elevated all these bugs to blocker status. BTW I wonder which is
• =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Alex_R=F8nne_Petersen?= (6/33) Aug 24 2012 They mean priority, so P1 would be highest.
• Kagamin (2/2) Aug 25 2012 docs:

Andrei Alexandrescu <SeeWebsiteForEmail erdani.org> writes:

Hi everybody,


I'm happy to announce that Dmitry has passed GSoC's final evaluation. 
Going forward he and I will focus on integrating his work within Phobos. 
This should have technically occurred during the allocated time itself, 
but it's not like Dmitry will run away with the money :o).

Please join me in congratulating Dmitry. And Dmitry, let's get going 
with the integration.


Thanks,

Andrei

"Simen Kjaeraas" <simen.kjaras gmail.com> writes:

On Fri, 24 Aug 2012 17:50:37 +0200, Andrei Alexandrescu  
<SeeWebsiteForEmail erdani.org> wrote:

 Hi everybody,


 I'm happy to announce that Dmitry has passed GSoC's final evaluation.  
 Going forward he and I will focus on integrating his work within Phobos.  
 This should have technically occurred during the allocated time itself,  
 but it's not like Dmitry will run away with the money :o).

 Please join me in congratulating Dmitry. And Dmitry, let's get going  
 with the integration.


Congratulations!

-- 
Simen

Dmitry Olshansky <dmitry.olsh gmail.com> writes:

On 24-Aug-12 19:50, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
 Hi everybody,


 I'm happy to announce that Dmitry has passed GSoC's final evaluation.
 Going forward he and I will focus on integrating his work within Phobos.
 This should have technically occurred during the allocated time itself,
 but it's not like Dmitry will run away with the money :o).

Thanks for your faith in me :o)

 Please join me in congratulating Dmitry. And Dmitry, let's get going
 with the integration.

It would be great if we can get help from compiler hackers, as I've 
collected some gems on my first attempt to merge it that may very well 
stall the process:

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8412
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8348

And this one makes all isXXX impure atm:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8446

-- 
Olshansky Dmitry

Andrei Alexandrescu <SeeWebsiteForEmail erdani.org> writes:

On 8/24/12 2:44 PM, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
 On 24-Aug-12 19:50, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
 Hi everybody,


 I'm happy to announce that Dmitry has passed GSoC's final evaluation.
 Going forward he and I will focus on integrating his work within Phobos.
 This should have technically occurred during the allocated time itself,
 but it's not like Dmitry will run away with the money :o).

 Thanks for your faith in me :o)

 Please join me in congratulating Dmitry. And Dmitry, let's get going
 with the integration.

 It would be great if we can get help from compiler hackers, as I've
 collected some gems on my first attempt to merge it that may very well
 stall the process:

 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8412
 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8348

 And this one makes all isXXX impure atm:
 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8446

I elevated all these bugs to blocker status. BTW I wonder which is 
higher - P1 or P5?

Andrei

=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Alex_R=F8nne_Petersen?= <alex lycus.org> writes:

On 24-08-2012 20:49, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
 On 8/24/12 2:44 PM, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
 On 24-Aug-12 19:50, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
 Hi everybody,


 I'm happy to announce that Dmitry has passed GSoC's final evaluation.
 Going forward he and I will focus on integrating his work within Phobos.
 This should have technically occurred during the allocated time itself,
 but it's not like Dmitry will run away with the money :o).

 Thanks for your faith in me :o)

 Please join me in congratulating Dmitry. And Dmitry, let's get going
 with the integration.

 It would be great if we can get help from compiler hackers, as I've
 collected some gems on my first attempt to merge it that may very well
 stall the process:

 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8412
 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8348

 And this one makes all isXXX impure atm:
 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8446

 I elevated all these bugs to blocker status. BTW I wonder which is
 higher - P1 or P5?

 Andrei

They mean priority, so P1 would be highest.

-- 
Alex Rønne Petersen
alex lycus.org
http://lycus.org

"Kagamin" <spam here.lot> writes:

docs: 
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/page.cgi?id=fields.html#importance