digitalmars.D - Why UFCS doesn't work with "with" statement?
- Lukanian (22/22) Jun 09 Why UFCS doesn't work with "with" statement?
- Doigt (7/29) Jun 09 It took me a while what you were trying to do, but I think I get
- Quirin Schroll (9/31) Jun 27 The `with` block changes the lookup rule so that unqualified
Why UFCS doesn't work with "with" statement? ```d struct MyStruct1 { int a, b; int sum(){ return a+b; } } int difference(ref MyStruct1 self) { return self.a-self.b; } // in main() MyStruct1 s = { 1, 2 }; s.difference().writeln; // works fine with(s){ sum().writeln; difference().writeln; // error: too few arguments, expected 1, got 0 } ```
Jun 09
On Monday, 9 June 2025 at 11:39:15 UTC, Lukanian wrote:Why UFCS doesn't work with "with" statement? ```d struct MyStruct1 { int a, b; int sum(){ return a+b; } } int difference(ref MyStruct1 self) { return self.a-self.b; } // in main() MyStruct1 s = { 1, 2 }; s.difference().writeln; // works fine with(s){ sum().writeln; difference().writeln; // error: too few arguments, expected 1, got 0 } ```It took me a while what you were trying to do, but I think I get it now. I'm not an expert on D, but from what I understand, the reason why it doesn't work is because the difference function is not a method of the struct. The "with" keyword works what's a member of the argument. So essentially yeah, you're calling difference without any argument.
Jun 09
On Monday, 9 June 2025 at 11:39:15 UTC, Lukanian wrote:Why UFCS doesn't work with "with" statement? ```d struct MyStruct1 { int a, b; int sum(){ return a+b; } } int difference(ref MyStruct1 self) { return self.a-self.b; } // in main() MyStruct1 s = { 1, 2 }; s.difference().writeln; // works fine with(s){ sum().writeln; difference().writeln; // error: too few arguments, expected 1, got 0 } ```The `with` block changes the lookup rule so that unqualified symbols (`sum` and `difference` in this case) are looked up in the scope of the (type of) the `with` argument first, only then normal lookup rules (innermost scope first) apply. What `with(x)` doesn’t do is try to resolve any unqualified symbol `s` as `x.s`. If it did that, your code would work. UFCS doesn’t make members and non-members equivalent, it’s just a calling syntax that works in *some* cases.
Jun 27