• Charlie (5/5) Jul 05 2007 99% of people here
• Charlie (2/9) Jul 08 2007
• torhu (4/15) Jul 08 2007 Sorry, I guess most people are tired of this discussion. And the

Charlie <charlie.fats gmail.com> writes:

99% of people here 
http://www.digitalmars.com/webnews/newsgroups.php?art_group=digitalmar
.D&article_id=54361 
said they wanted to try it.

Walter, are you planning to at least try this ?

Charlie

Charlie <charlie.fats gmail.com> writes:

( Guess thats a no )


Charlie wrote:
 99% of people here 
 http://www.digitalmars.com/webnews/newsgroups.php?art_group=digitalmar
.D&article_id=54361 
 said they wanted to try it.
 
 Walter, are you planning to at least try this ?
 
 Charlie

torhu <fake address.dude> writes:

Charlie wrote:
 ( Guess thats a no )
 
 
 Charlie wrote:
 99% of people here 
 http://www.digitalmars.com/webnews/newsgroups.php?art_group=digitalmar
.D&article_id=54361 
 said they wanted to try it.
 
 Walter, are you planning to at least try this ?
 
 Charlie


Sorry, I guess most people are tired of this discussion.  And the 
current D 2.0 way seems like a good compromise.  Just adding 'in' in 
front of the parameter works for me.