• Zz (4/4) Jun 20 2007 This is quite an interesting article, with D version 2.0 on it's way I
• Bill Baxter (5/11) Jun 21 2007 I don't know squat about RapidMind, but Michael McCool's last big
• Charlie (8/14) Jun 29 2007 Good Article! If D had builtin support for transparent parallezation,

Zz <zz a.zz> writes:

This is quite an interesting article, with D version 2.0 on it's way I 
guess this might be of some interest to Walter.

http://www.ddj.com/dept/cpp/199902702

Zz

Bill Baxter <dnewsgroup billbaxter.com> writes:

Zz wrote:
 This is quite an interesting article, with D version 2.0 on it's way I 
 guess this might be of some interest to Walter.
 
 http://www.ddj.com/dept/cpp/199902702
 
 Zz

I don't know squat about RapidMind, but Michael McCool's last big 
project was Sh, which is a very nifty way to leverage the power of GPUs. 
  So I bet there's some connection between these two projects.

--bb

Charlie <charlie.fats gmail.com> writes:

Good Article!  If D had builtin support for transparent parallezation, 
it could easily be the number one contender for the new market of 
multi-core, which according to many is the unavoidable future ( to quote 
Sutter 'The free lunch is over' ).

I'll go ahead and use this post to voice my unwavering agenda as well :D 
, what D needs is language stability, a large standard library, and 
tools tools tools!

Zz wrote:
 This is quite an interesting article, with D version 2.0 on it's way I 
 guess this might be of some interest to Walter.
 
 http://www.ddj.com/dept/cpp/199902702
 
 Zz