• Raynor (9/9) Mar 30 2008 I am trying to make a Qt binding for D. I tried the new C++
• Walter Bright (3/13) Mar 30 2008 There aren't any plans at the moment for improving it.
• arnaud (2/19) Mar 30 2008

Raynor <memphis007fr yahoo.fr> writes:

I am trying to make a Qt binding for D. I tried the new C++ 
compatibility with D 2 but its very limited:
- No delegate to C++ methods in D so signals to and from C++ are impossibles
- We must declare all the methods of a C++ class and in the same order 
because apparently DMD rely on the order of the virtual table and not on 
the name mangling.

I know interfacing with C++ is partialy impossible but i want to know if 
  there are plans for improvement or if i can begin to bind Qt with a C 
interface.

Walter Bright <newshound1 digitalmars.com> writes:

Raynor wrote:
 I am trying to make a Qt binding for D. I tried the new C++ 
 compatibility with D 2 but its very limited:
 - No delegate to C++ methods in D so signals to and from C++ are 
 impossibles
 - We must declare all the methods of a C++ class and in the same order 
 because apparently DMD rely on the order of the virtual table and not on 
 the name mangling.

The name mangling gives no clue about the order in the vtbl[].


 I know interfacing with C++ is partialy impossible but i want to know if 
  there are plans for improvement or if i can begin to bind Qt with a C 
 interface.

There aren't any plans at the moment for improving it.

arnaud <arnaud.versini gmail.com> writes:

Has nothing been planified for non static and non virtual functions?

Walter Bright a écrit :
 Raynor wrote:
 I am trying to make a Qt binding for D. I tried the new C++ 
 compatibility with D 2 but its very limited:
 - No delegate to C++ methods in D so signals to and from C++ are 
 impossibles
 - We must declare all the methods of a C++ class and in the same order 
 because apparently DMD rely on the order of the virtual table and not 
 on the name mangling.

 
 The name mangling gives no clue about the order in the vtbl[].
 
 
 I know interfacing with C++ is partialy impossible but i want to know 
 if  there are plans for improvement or if i can begin to bind Qt with 
 a C interface.

 
 There aren't any plans at the moment for improving it.