• Elvis (2/2) Aug 05 2013 Owned pointer in Rust is a good design IMO, how about D
• Nick Treleaven (3/5) Aug 06 2013 I think this is about the closest ATM:
• Ruslan Mullakhmetov (5/10) Aug 09 2013 would be good to have it as language feature like scoped
• Tobias Pankrath (7/18) Aug 09 2013 While I'm convinced that unique pointers / types are a important
• Ruslan Mullakhmetov (3/23) Aug 09 2013 No, I didn't assert that. I just proposed a synthetic sugar =).

"Elvis" <pycerl qq.com> writes:

Owned pointer in Rust is a good design IMO, how about D
equivalent?

Nick Treleaven <ntrel-public yahoo.co.uk> writes:

On 06/08/2013 06:26, Elvis wrote:
 Owned pointer in Rust is a good design IMO, how about D
 equivalent?

I think this is about the closest ATM:

"Ruslan Mullakhmetov" <nobody example.com> writes:

On Tuesday, 6 August 2013 at 16:32:43 UTC, Nick Treleaven wrote:
 On 06/08/2013 06:26, Elvis wrote:
 Owned pointer in Rust is a good design IMO, how about D
 equivalent?

 I think this is about the closest ATM:


would be good to have it as language feature like scoped 
reference. this clear code (as from c++11 experience abundant 
std::unique_ptr<T> get me irritated). And of course unique idiom  
(ownership) get D usable for realtime (removed GC)

"Tobias Pankrath" <tobias pankrath.net> writes:

On Friday, 9 August 2013 at 18:16:57 UTC, Ruslan Mullakhmetov 
wrote:
 On Tuesday, 6 August 2013 at 16:32:43 UTC, Nick Treleaven wrote:
 On 06/08/2013 06:26, Elvis wrote:
 Owned pointer in Rust is a good design IMO, how about D
 equivalent?

 I think this is about the closest ATM:


 would be good to have it as language feature like scoped 
 reference. this clear code (as from c++11 experience abundant 
 std::unique_ptr<T> get me irritated). And of course unique 
 idiom  (ownership) get D usable for realtime (removed GC)

While I'm convinced that unique pointers / types are a important 
concept, especially if combined with immutable. (What's 
transitive unique/immutable can be cast to immutable .. ), I 
don't think that just adding a new type modifier will lead D 
anywhere.

"Ruslan Mullakhmetov" <nobody example.com> writes:

On Friday, 9 August 2013 at 19:05:26 UTC, Tobias Pankrath wrote:
 On Friday, 9 August 2013 at 18:16:57 UTC, Ruslan Mullakhmetov 
 wrote:
 On Tuesday, 6 August 2013 at 16:32:43 UTC, Nick Treleaven 
 wrote:
 On 06/08/2013 06:26, Elvis wrote:
 Owned pointer in Rust is a good design IMO, how about D
 equivalent?

 I think this is about the closest ATM:


 would be good to have it as language feature like scoped 
 reference. this clear code (as from c++11 experience abundant 
 std::unique_ptr<T> get me irritated). And of course unique 
 idiom  (ownership) get D usable for realtime (removed GC)

 While I'm convinced that unique pointers / types are a 
 important concept, especially if combined with immutable. 
 (What's transitive unique/immutable can be cast to immutable .. 
 ), I don't think that just adding a new type modifier will lead 
 D anywhere.

No, I didn't assert that. I just proposed a synthetic sugar =). 
Unique pointer/types are already in D (at the library level).