www.digitalmars.com         C & C++   DMDScript  

digitalmars.D - Is the D tools repository Boost licensed ?

reply Marco Leise <Marco.Leise gmx.de> writes:
I want to package them and need to know if the license for the
whole repository is and will be Boost? E.g. does someone check
new contributions for their license, so we can write a package
description once and forget about it?

-- 
Marco
Jan 09 2014
parent reply Marco Leise <Marco.Leise gmx.de> writes:
Am Thu, 9 Jan 2014 16:29:28 +0100
schrieb Marco Leise <Marco.Leise gmx.de>:

 I want to package them and need to know if the license for the
 whole repository is and will be Boost? E.g. does someone check
 new contributions for their license, so we can write a package
 description once and forget about it?
Thank you Dicebot - manager of Arch packages - for asking this before: http://forum.dlang.org/thread/esiqbzfiekzjcmsidsxo forum.dlang.org#post-kjenbd:241gin:242:40digitalmars.com Should a global LICENSE file be added to the repo as more and more people start redistributing the source .zip ? -- Marco
Jan 09 2014
parent "Dicebot" <public dicebot.lv> writes:
On Thursday, 9 January 2014 at 15:32:21 UTC, Marco Leise wrote:
 Am Thu, 9 Jan 2014 16:29:28 +0100
 schrieb Marco Leise <Marco.Leise gmx.de>:

 I want to package them and need to know if the license for the
 whole repository is and will be Boost? E.g. does someone check
 new contributions for their license, so we can write a package
 description once and forget about it?
Thank you Dicebot - manager of Arch packages - for asking this before: http://forum.dlang.org/thread/esiqbzfiekzjcmsidsxo forum.dlang.org#post-kjenbd:241gin:242:40digitalmars.com Should a global LICENSE file be added to the repo as more and more people start redistributing the source .zip ?
Right now it is inline for every source file as I was not sure if conforming to common license was mandatory for inclusion into "tools" repo.
Jan 09 2014