• Atila Neves (4/4) Mar 31 2014 http://atilanevesoncode.wordpress.com/2014/03/31/increasing-performance-...
• bearophile (5/9) Mar 31 2014 There are updated LDC2 versions here:
• Atila Neves (7/16) Mar 31 2014 I figured, but I try not to have to compile my own binaries. I'm
• John Colvin (2/6) Mar 31 2014 What about -inline and -noboundscheck ?
• Atila Neves (4/13) Mar 31 2014 Good question. I forgot about those. I wish it was easier to do
• Atila Neves (4/18) Mar 31 2014 I updated the results. Using those two options brings dmd a lot
• Meta (2/6) Mar 31 2014 What's the title on Hackernews? I can't seem to find it.
• Meta (3/4) Mar 31 2014 Eh, nevermind, found it. Hackernews really needs a search
• simendsjo (3/6) Mar 31 2014 Perhaps we should start linking to this one instead?
• srean (10/14) Mar 31 2014 Erm thats where I am coming from, the search feature is there at
• Meta (4/19) Mar 31 2014 Ah, you're right. That could definitely be better placed... I
• srean (4/16) Apr 01 2014 Not a question to you in particular, but dont know how to add to
• Joakim (3/9) Apr 01 2014 Andrei suggested something similar on github a couple weeks ago:
• Andrei Alexandrescu (4/7) Mar 31 2014 To search hackernews: https://hn.algolia.com. Here:

"Atila Neves" <atila.neves gmail.com> writes:

http://atilanevesoncode.wordpress.com/2014/03/31/increasing-performance-with-static-polymorphism-and-other-neat-tricks/

http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/21tszv/increasing_performance_with_static_polymorphism/

On hacker news as well, but we know how links to that go.

Atila

"bearophile" <bearophileHUGS lycos.com> writes:

Atila Neves:

 http://atilanevesoncode.wordpress.com/2014/03/31/increasing-performance-with-static-polymorphism-and-other-neat-tricks/

I left ldc out because its frontend (at least the package 
currently available on Arch Linux) is older and can’t compile 
the code,<

There are updated LDC2 versions here:
https://github.com/ldc-developers/ldc/releases/

Bye,
bearophile

"Atila Neves" <atila.neves gmail.com> writes:

I figured, but I try not to have to compile my own binaries. I'm 
running Arch Linux so I can get the new and shiny toys without 
having to! :P

When it gets released and package I might add its numbers to the 
tables.

Atila


On Monday, 31 March 2014 at 15:04:20 UTC, bearophile wrote:
 Atila Neves:

 http://atilanevesoncode.wordpress.com/2014/03/31/increasing-performance-with-static-polymorphism-and-other-neat-tricks/

I left ldc out because its frontend (at least the package 
currently available on Arch Linux) is older and can’t compile 
the code,<

 There are updated LDC2 versions here:
 https://github.com/ldc-developers/ldc/releases/

 Bye,
 bearophile

"John Colvin" <john.loughran.colvin gmail.com> writes:

On Monday, 31 March 2014 at 14:00:28 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
 http://atilanevesoncode.wordpress.com/2014/03/31/increasing-performance-with-static-polymorphism-and-other-neat-tricks/

 http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/21tszv/increasing_performance_with_static_polymorphism/

 On hacker news as well, but we know how links to that go.

 Atila

What about -inline and -noboundscheck ?

"Atila Neves" <atila.neves gmail.com> writes:

Good question. I forgot about those. I wish it was easier to do 
release builds with dmd. Gonna try that out now.

Atila

On Monday, 31 March 2014 at 15:20:52 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
 On Monday, 31 March 2014 at 14:00:28 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
 http://atilanevesoncode.wordpress.com/2014/03/31/increasing-performance-with-static-polymorphism-and-other-neat-tricks/

 http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/21tszv/increasing_performance_with_static_polymorphism/

 On hacker news as well, but we know how links to that go.

 Atila

 What about -inline and -noboundscheck ?

"Atila Neves" <atila.neves gmail.com> writes:

I updated the results. Using those two options brings dmd a lot 
closer to gdc and even surpasses it in one benchmark. Interesting.

Atila

On Monday, 31 March 2014 at 15:41:43 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
 Good question. I forgot about those. I wish it was easier to do 
 release builds with dmd. Gonna try that out now.

 Atila

 On Monday, 31 March 2014 at 15:20:52 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
 On Monday, 31 March 2014 at 14:00:28 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
 http://atilanevesoncode.wordpress.com/2014/03/31/increasing-performance-with-static-polymorphism-and-other-neat-tricks/

 http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/21tszv/increasing_performance_with_static_polymorphism/

 On hacker news as well, but we know how links to that go.

 Atila

 What about -inline and -noboundscheck ?

"Meta" <jared771 gmail.com> writes:

On Monday, 31 March 2014 at 14:00:28 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
 http://atilanevesoncode.wordpress.com/2014/03/31/increasing-performance-with-static-polymorphism-and-other-neat-tricks/

 http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/21tszv/increasing_performance_with_static_polymorphism/

 On hacker news as well, but we know how links to that go.

 Atila

What's the title on Hackernews? I can't seem to find it.

"Meta" <jared771 gmail.com> writes:

On Monday, 31 March 2014 at 15:22:23 UTC, Meta wrote:
 What's the title on Hackernews? I can't seem to find it.

Eh, nevermind, found it. Hackernews really needs a search 
function.

simendsjo <simendsjo gmail.com> writes:

On 03/31/2014 05:24 PM, Meta wrote:
 On Monday, 31 March 2014 at 15:22:23 UTC, Meta wrote:
 What's the title on Hackernews? I can't seem to find it.

 Eh, nevermind, found it. Hackernews really needs a search function.

Perhaps we should start linking to this one instead?
https://hn.algolia.com/#!/story/forever/0/Increasing%20performance%20with%20static%20polymorphism%20(and%20other%20neat%20tricks)

"srean" <srean.list gmail.com> writes:

On Monday, 31 March 2014 at 15:24:03 UTC, Meta wrote:
 On Monday, 31 March 2014 at 15:22:23 UTC, Meta wrote:
 What's the title on Hackernews? I can't seem to find it.

 Eh, nevermind, found it.

 Hackernews really needs a search function.

Erm thats where I am coming from, the search feature is there at
the bottom, take a look at the footer.

I have a slightly tangential question, repeating what I asked on
HN

Can't the destructor issue of scopebuffer be mitigated by using

       hasElaborateDestructor( )

For instance have two versions one with a destructor for non POD
and another without. The compiler dispatches to the appropriate
one at compile time. There should not be any loss in performance.

"Meta" <jared771 gmail.com> writes:

On Monday, 31 March 2014 at 23:57:09 UTC, srean wrote:
 On Monday, 31 March 2014 at 15:24:03 UTC, Meta wrote:
 On Monday, 31 March 2014 at 15:22:23 UTC, Meta wrote:
 What's the title on Hackernews? I can't seem to find it.

 Eh, nevermind, found it.

 Hackernews really needs a search function.

 Erm thats where I am coming from, the search feature is there at
 the bottom, take a look at the footer.

 I have a slightly tangential question, repeating what I asked on
 HN

 Can't the destructor issue of scopebuffer be mitigated by using

       hasElaborateDestructor( )

 For instance have two versions one with a destructor for non POD
 and another without. The compiler dispatches to the appropriate
 one at compile time. There should not be any loss in 
 performance.

Ah, you're right. That could definitely be better placed... I 
generally read the Hackernews RSS feed, not the site itself, so 
I'm not well-accustomed to the actual site.

"srean" <srean.list gmail.com> writes:

Not a question to you in particular, but dont know how to add to
a thread without replying.

I am very curious about the following (I think by the time I had
clarified my question Walter had left the building)

 I have a slightly tangential question, repeating what I asked 
 on HN

 Can't the destructor issue of scopebuffer be mitigated by using

      hasElaborateDestructor( )

 For instance have two versions one with a destructor for non  
 POD
 and another without. The compiler dispatches to the appropriate
 one at compile time. There should not be any loss in 
 performance.

"Joakim" <joakim airpost.net> writes:

On Monday, 31 March 2014 at 23:57:09 UTC, srean wrote:
 Can't the destructor issue of scopebuffer be mitigated by using

       hasElaborateDestructor( )

 For instance have two versions one with a destructor for non POD
 and another without. The compiler dispatches to the appropriate
 one at compile time. There should not be any loss in 
 performance.

Andrei suggested something similar on github a couple weeks ago:

https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/2014#issuecomment-37947056

Andrei Alexandrescu <SeeWebsiteForEmail erdani.org> writes:

On 3/31/14, 7:00 AM, Atila Neves wrote:
 http://atilanevesoncode.wordpress.com/2014/03/31/increasing-performance-with-static-polymorphism-and-other-neat-tricks/


 http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/21tszv/increasing_performance_with_static_polymorphism/


 On hacker news as well, but we know how links to that go.

To search hackernews: https://hn.algolia.com. Here: 
https://hn.algolia.com/#!/story/forever/prefix/0/static%20polymorphis

Andrei