• bearophile (13/13) May 03 2009 Another small one for Leandro Lucarella:
• Georg Wrede (6/19) May 03 2009 Fedora-10, Core2 Quad, 2.4GHz, last DMD2,
• bearophile (5/10) May 03 2009 Thank you for your timing. It is consistent with the my time.
• Georg Wrede (6/18) May 03 2009 real 0m2.218s
• bearophile (5/10) May 03 2009 I agree. I usually time things more than three times, but three is the m...
• Leandro Lucarella (7/14) May 04 2009 Thanks! =)

bearophile <bearophileHUGS lycos.com> writes:

Another small one for Leandro Lucarella:

struct S { int a;  S* p; }
void main() {
  foreach (ref s; new S*[4_000_000])
    s = new S;
}

Timings N=4_000_000, best of 3, seconds:
  D1: 2.47
  D2: 2.68

On WinXp, Core2 2 GHz, last DMD1 and DMD2.
In future I may use private email instead.

Bye,
bearophile

Georg Wrede <georg.wrede iki.fi> writes:

bearophile wrote:
 Another small one for Leandro Lucarella:
 
 struct S { int a;  S* p; }
 void main() {
   foreach (ref s; new S*[4_000_000])
     s = new S;
 }
 
 Timings N=4_000_000, best of 3, seconds:
   D1: 2.47
   D2: 2.68
 
 On WinXp, Core2 2 GHz, last DMD1 and DMD2.

Fedora-10, Core2 Quad, 2.4GHz, last DMD2,
dmd -release -O :
real	0m2.398s
user	0m2.337s
sys	0m0.061s

bearophile <bearophileHUGS lycos.com> writes:

Georg Wrede:
 Fedora-10, Core2 Quad, 2.4GHz, last DMD2,
 dmd -release -O :
 real	0m2.398s
 user	0m2.337s
 sys	0m0.061s

Thank you for your timing. It is consistent with the my time.
But the purpose of my little test was to show that for little benchmark there's
a performance decrease between D1 and D2 (probably because of the GC). So can
you show the timing for D1 too on the same machine of yours?

Bye,
bearophile

Georg Wrede <georg.wrede iki.fi> writes:

bearophile wrote:
 Georg Wrede:
 Fedora-10, Core2 Quad, 2.4GHz, last DMD2,
 dmd -release -O :
 real	0m2.398s
 user	0m2.337s
 sys	0m0.061s

 
 Thank you for your timing. It is consistent with the my time.
 But the purpose of my little test was to show that for little
 benchmark there's a performance decrease between D1 and D2 (probably
 because of the GC). So can you show the timing for D1 too on the same
 machine of yours?

real	0m2.218s
user	0m2.169s
sys	0m0.047s

This is best of three. But I'm convinced there's too much variation with 
best of three. Middle of ten would be somewhat better.

bearophile <bearophileHUGS lycos.com> writes:

Georg Wrede:
 real	0m2.218s
 user	0m2.169s
 sys	0m0.047s

Thank you. Such results are in line with mine. Leandro will like that.

 This is best of three. But I'm convinced there's too much variation with 
 best of three. Middle of ten would be somewhat better.

I agree. I usually time things more than three times, but three is the minimum
:-)

Bye,
bearophile

Leandro Lucarella <llucax gmail.com> writes:

bearophile, el  3 de mayo a las 15:03 me escribiste:
 Another small one for Leandro Lucarella:
 
 struct S { int a;  S* p; }
 void main() {
   foreach (ref s; new S*[4_000_000])
     s = new S;
 }

Thanks! =)

-- 
Leandro Lucarella (luca) | Blog colectivo: http://www.mazziblog.com.ar/blog/
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
GPG Key: 5F5A8D05 (F8CD F9A7 BF00 5431 4145  104C 949E BFB6 5F5A 8D05)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------