deadalnix
(3/3)
May 28 2014
On Wednesday, 28 May 2014 at 22:48:22 UTC, Jonathan M Davis via
-
Marco Leise
(6/11)
May 29 2014
So I figure you didn't read the text/html part with the nice
Vladimir Panteleev
(6/6)
May 28 2014
On Wednesday, 28 May 2014 at 22:48:22 UTC, Jonathan M Davis via
Chris
(3/3)
May 29 2014
On Wednesday, 28 May 2014 at 22:48:22 UTC, Jonathan M Davis via
-
JR
(2/5)
May 29 2014
Compiles to only ELF/DWARF headers!
Hi,
D2 has been out for a while. Looking to see what the roadmap is
like towards D3?
Suminda
"Suminda Dharmasena" wrote in message
news:dgufafcodplrxrqcgsqi forum.dlang.org...
Hi,
D2 has been out for a while. Looking to see what the roadmap is like
towards D3?
Suminda
No.
On Wednesday, 28 May 2014 at 04:24:21 UTC, Daniel Murphy wrote:
"Suminda Dharmasena" wrote in message
news:dgufafcodplrxrqcgsqi forum.dlang.org...
Hi,
D2 has been out for a while. Looking to see what the roadmap
is like towards D3?
Suminda
No.
No++;
On Wednesday, 28 May 2014 at 03:25:28 UTC, Suminda Dharmasena
wrote:
Hi,
D2 has been out for a while. Looking to see what the roadmap is
like towards D3?
Suminda
No, it has not been out for a while. I would even say that it's
not out yet!
It still doesn't exist yet in the same way as D1.
D1 was a clearly defined snapshot of the language at a particular
moment in time.
The feature list is unchanged since D1.014, except for array
operations which were finally implemented in D1.034. It reached
release 1.076 just with bugfixes, ie there were 61 bugfix
releases.
D2 is the ongoing language development, and we still don't have a
stability branch more recent than the D1 branch. Almost every
release has contained a new feature, and I can't see that
stopping anytime soon.
Reposting this without the html problems...
On Wed, 28 May 2014 08:41:43 +0000
Don via Digitalmars-d <digitalmars-d puremagic.com> wrote:
On Wednesday, 28 May 2014 at 03:25:28 UTC, Suminda Dharmasena
wrote:
Hi,
D2 has been out for a while. Looking to see what the roadmap is
like towards D3?
Suminda
No, it has not been out for a while. I would even say that it's
not out yet!
It still doesn't exist yet in the same way as D1.
D1 was a clearly defined snapshot of the language at a particular
moment in time.
The feature list is unchanged since D1.014, except for array
operations which were finally implemented in D1.034. It reached
release 1.076 just with bugfixes, ie there were 61 bugfix
releases.
D2 is the ongoing language development, and we still don't have a
stability branch more recent than the D1 branch. Almost every
release has contained a new feature, and I can't see that
stopping anytime soon.
Not to mention, there probably aren't even all that many places that we'd
change the language in a non-backwards compatible way even if we could start
from scratch (and even in those places, we might not change them in D3,
because it would make porting from D2 to D3 much riskier). By no means is D2
perfect, but for the most part, I think that we can either fix the problems
with it without resorting to D3, or we'd end up having similar problems in D3
anyway.
Regardless, we need to make D2 a success before we even consider considering
creating something like D3. And there may never be a D3. That's a question that
really shouldn't be up for discussion for years yet.
- Jonathan M Davis
On Wednesday, 28 May 2014 at 03:25:28 UTC, Suminda Dharmasena
wrote:
Hi,
D2 has been out for a while. Looking to see what the roadmap is
like towards D3?
Suminda
FYI there is no stable version of D2. There are still many grey
areas and there are yet to come possible radical changes to come
(like final-by-default for an example).
However, it may be a good idea to have a list of things that are
commonly postponed for D3 ocassionally. You are free to go
through NG threads, and compile this list. We have
http://wiki.dlang.org - perfect place for that.
<html><head></head><body><div style="font-family: Verdana;font-size:
12.0px;"><div>On Wed, 28 May 2014 08:41:43 +0000<br/>
Don via Digitalmars-d <digitalmars-d puremagic.com> wrote:<br/>
<br/>
> On Wednesday, 28 May 2014 at 03:25:28 UTC, Suminda Dharmasena<br/>
> wrote:<br/>
> > Hi,<br/>
> ><br/>
> > D2 has been out for a while. Looking to see what the roadmap is<br/>
> > like towards D3?<br/>
> ><br/>
> > Suminda<br/>
><br/>
> not out yet!<br/>
><br/>
> D1 was a clearly defined snapshot of the language at a particular<br/>
> moment in time.<br/>
> The feature list is unchanged since D1.014, except for array<br/>
> operations which were finally implemented in D1.034. It reached<br/>
> release 1.076 just with bugfixes, ie there were 61 bugfix<br/>
> releases.<br/>
><br/>
> stability branch more recent than the D1 branch. Almost every<br/>
> stopping anytime soon.<br/>
<br/>
change the language in a non-backwards compatible way even if we could
start<br/>
from scratch (and even in those places, we might not change them in D3,<br/>
because it would make porting from D2 to D3 much riskier). By no means is
D2<br/>
perfect, but for the most part, I think that we can either fix the problems<br/>
D3<br/>
anyway.<br/>
<br/>
Regardless, we need to make D2 a success before we even consider
considering<br/>
that</div>
<div><br/>
- Jonathan M Davis</div></div></body></html>
On Wednesday, 28 May 2014 at 22:48:22 UTC, Jonathan M Davis via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
That's interesting :D
Am Thu, 29 May 2014 00:06:29 +0000
schrieb "deadalnix" <deadalnix gmail.com>:
On Wednesday, 28 May 2014 at 22:48:22 UTC, Jonathan M Davis via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
That's interesting :D
So I figure you didn't read the text/html part with the nice
1.5x line height which makes reading easy on the eyes? No? :)
--
Marco
On Wednesday, 28 May 2014 at 22:48:22 UTC, Jonathan M Davis via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
Please configure your email client to include a text/plain part.
Your messages are unreadable to any users of clients that ignore
text/html parts, which includes all users of the forum web
interface.
On Thu, 29 May 2014 02:30:05 -0400, Vladimir Panteleev
<vladimir thecybershadow.net> wrote:
On Wednesday, 28 May 2014 at 22:48:22 UTC, Jonathan M Davis via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
Please configure your email client to include a text/plain part. Your
messages are unreadable to any users of clients that ignore text/html
parts, which includes all users of the forum web interface.
Hah, I wondered why these snarky replies quoting nothing were showing up.
I saw the text from Jonathan, so I was confused :)
It would be cool if the web forum software replied with a "that doesn't
work for me" email, but of course, we no longer have actual email
addresses in the posts with this "via Digitalmars-d" stuff :D
I can imagine many people use mail clients that by default use text/html.
-Steve
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 08:46:25AM -0400, Steven Schveighoffer via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Thu, 29 May 2014 02:30:05 -0400, Vladimir Panteleev
<vladimir thecybershadow.net> wrote:
On Wednesday, 28 May 2014 at 22:48:22 UTC, Jonathan M Davis via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
Please configure your email client to include a text/plain part. Your
messages are unreadable to any users of clients that ignore text/html
parts, which includes all users of the forum web interface.
Hah, I wondered why these snarky replies quoting nothing were showing
up. I saw the text from Jonathan, so I was confused :)
It would be cool if the web forum software replied with a "that
doesn't work for me" email, but of course, we no longer have actual
email addresses in the posts with this "via Digitalmars-d" stuff :D
I can imagine many people use mail clients that by default use
text/html.
[...]
My mail client only uses text/plain.
T
--
Not all rumours are as misleading as this one.
On Thu, 29 May 2014 06:30:05 +0000
Vladimir Panteleev via Digitalmars-d <digitalmars-d puremagic.com>
wrote:
On Wednesday, 28 May 2014 at 22:48:22 UTC, Jonathan M Davis via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
Please configure your email client to include a text/plain part.
Your messages are unreadable to any users of clients that ignore
text/html parts, which includes all users of the forum web
interface.
Yeah, sorry about that. The web interface that I'm forced to use for e-mail
when I'm at work just got changed, and it screwed with my settings - and
clearly in a very nasty way. It should be fixed now though.
- Jonathan M Davis
On Friday, 30 May 2014 at 06:14:15 UTC, Jonathan M Davis via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
Yeah, sorry about that. The web interface that I'm forced to
use for e-mail
when I'm at work just got changed, and it screwed with my
settings - and
clearly in a very nasty way. It should be fixed now though.
- Jonathan M Davis
Perhaps it is fixed, but on the web forum still there's nothing
to be seen.
What was it about? Something serious or some joke/semiserious
stuff?
On Fri, 30 May 2014 07:02:33 +0000
francesco cattoglio via Digitalmars-d <digitalmars-d puremagic.com>
wrote:
On Friday, 30 May 2014 at 06:14:15 UTC, Jonathan M Davis via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
Yeah, sorry about that. The web interface that I'm forced to
use for e-mail
when I'm at work just got changed, and it screwed with my
settings - and
clearly in a very nasty way. It should be fixed now though.
- Jonathan M Davis
Perhaps it is fixed, but on the web forum still there's nothing
to be seen.
What was it about? Something serious or some joke/semiserious
stuff?
What was what? The post I posted to this thread that got munged? I could
repost it, though there are several posts like that across the newsgroup,
because I posted several times before I realized what's going on.
- Jonathan M Davis
On Wednesday, 28 May 2014 at 22:48:22 UTC, Jonathan M Davis via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
Is this the first attempt at D Version 3? :-)
On Thursday, 29 May 2014 at 08:50:38 UTC, Chris wrote:
On Wednesday, 28 May 2014 at 22:48:22 UTC, Jonathan M Davis via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
Is this the first attempt at D Version 3? :-)
Compiles to only ELF/DWARF headers!
"Anton" <Anton Texaco.tx> 