digitalmars.D - DLang and Golang web framework =?UTF-8?B?YmVuY2htYXJrc++8gQ==?=
- zoujiaqing (115/115) May 14 2022 Yesterday I tested the latest version of Fasthttp and Archttp
- ikod (2/12) May 14 2022 Very cool! Will try to play with it.
- electricface (2/16) May 14 2022 I think the example is too simple to make a comparison.
- zoujiaqing (7/27) May 15 2022 These contrast with the system's high concurrency, thread
Yesterday I tested the latest version of Fasthttp and Archttp
performance. (In my Debian virtual machine.)
* Archttp :8080
* Fasthttp :8081
* LDC 1.27
* Golang 1.18
Archttp:
```D
import archttp;
void main(string[] args)
{
Archttp app = new Archttp;
app.Bind(8080);
app.Get("/", (context) {
auto response = context.response();
response.body("Hello, World!");
});
app.Run();
}
```
Fasthttp:
```go
package main
import (
"fmt"
"github.com/buaazp/fasthttprouter"
"github.com/valyala/fasthttp"
)
func Index(ctx *fasthttp.RequestCtx) {
fmt.Fprint(ctx, "Hello world .)")
}
func main() {
router := fasthttprouter.New()
router.GET("/", Index)
fasthttp.ListenAndServe(":8081", router.Handler)
}
```
```txt
Last login: Sat May 14 14:05:58 on ttys012
zoujiaqing mac ~ % wrk -t8 -c100 -d5s --latency
http://192.168.119.128:8081
Running 5s test http://192.168.119.128:8081
8 threads and 100 connections
Thread Stats Avg Stdev Max +/- Stdev
Latency 4.59ms 583.21us 11.55ms 74.52%
Req/Sec 2.62k 108.28 2.81k 77.45%
Latency Distribution
50% 4.53ms
75% 4.90ms
90% 5.30ms
99% 6.17ms
106510 requests in 5.10s, 15.13MB read
Requests/sec: 20869.73
Transfer/sec: 2.97MB
zoujiaqing mac ~ % wrk -t8 -c100 -d5s --latency
http://192.168.119.128:8080
Running 5s test http://192.168.119.128:8080
8 threads and 100 connections
Thread Stats Avg Stdev Max +/- Stdev
Latency 4.60ms 2.06ms 40.65ms 79.75%
Req/Sec 2.66k 184.97 2.93k 89.22%
Latency Distribution
50% 4.15ms
75% 5.30ms
90% 7.05ms
99% 11.77ms
108005 requests in 5.10s, 11.85MB read
Requests/sec: 21165.06
Transfer/sec: 2.32MB
zoujiaqing mac ~ % wrk -t8 -c100 -d5s --latency
http://192.168.119.128:8081
Running 5s test http://192.168.119.128:8081
8 threads and 100 connections
Thread Stats Avg Stdev Max +/- Stdev
Latency 4.73ms 1.14ms 23.42ms 88.25%
Req/Sec 2.56k 208.52 2.92k 83.29%
Latency Distribution
50% 4.57ms
75% 4.99ms
90% 5.55ms
99% 9.26ms
103703 requests in 5.10s, 14.74MB read
Requests/sec: 20321.51
Transfer/sec: 2.89MB
zoujiaqing mac ~ % wrk -t8 -c100 -d5s --latency
http://192.168.119.128:8080
Running 5s test http://192.168.119.128:8080
8 threads and 100 connections
Thread Stats Avg Stdev Max +/- Stdev
Latency 4.51ms 1.88ms 22.04ms 77.43%
Req/Sec 2.70k 111.17 2.97k 80.88%
Latency Distribution
50% 4.12ms
75% 5.23ms
90% 6.85ms
99% 11.00ms
109516 requests in 5.10s, 12.01MB read
Requests/sec: 21463.54
Transfer/sec: 2.35MB
zoujiaqing mac ~ %
```
At least in my Debian virtual machine Archttp behaves very close
to Fasthttp! Even better than Fasthttp! I hope DLang can develop
better in the field of microservices in the future.
I just released the first test version of Archttp:
https://forum.dlang.org/thread/jckjrgnmgsulewnrefpr forum.dlang.org
I just passed the test on macOS and Linux! I will continue to
optimize Archttp's performance and cross-platform capabilities in
the future. We hope you can give us some optimization suggestions
to make DLang Web framework performance better.
May 14 2022
On Saturday, 14 May 2022 at 21:42:26 UTC, zoujiaqing wrote:At least in my Debian virtual machine Archttp behaves very close to Fasthttp! Even better than Fasthttp! I hope DLang can develop better in the field of microservices in the future. I just released the first test version of Archttp: https://forum.dlang.org/thread/jckjrgnmgsulewnrefpr forum.dlang.org I just passed the test on macOS and Linux! I will continue to optimize Archttp's performance and cross-platform capabilities in the future. We hope you can give us some optimization suggestions to make DLang Web framework performance better.Very cool! Will try to play with it.
May 14 2022
On Saturday, 14 May 2022 at 22:20:55 UTC, ikod wrote:On Saturday, 14 May 2022 at 21:42:26 UTC, zoujiaqing wrote:I think the example is too simple to make a comparison.At least in my Debian virtual machine Archttp behaves very close to Fasthttp! Even better than Fasthttp! I hope DLang can develop better in the field of microservices in the future. I just released the first test version of Archttp: https://forum.dlang.org/thread/jckjrgnmgsulewnrefpr forum.dlang.org I just passed the test on macOS and Linux! I will continue to optimize Archttp's performance and cross-platform capabilities in the future. We hope you can give us some optimization suggestions to make DLang Web framework performance better.Very cool! Will try to play with it.
May 14 2022
zoujiaqing <zoujiaqing gmail.com> On Sunday, 15 May 2022 at 00:58:13 UTC, electricface wrote:On Saturday, 14 May 2022 at 22:20:55 UTC, ikod wrote:These contrast with the system's high concurrency, thread pooling, and memory optimization. Web framework performance comparisons for all languages were tested in this way. You can go here and study benchmarks: https://github.com/TechEmpower/FrameworkBenchmarksOn Saturday, 14 May 2022 at 21:42:26 UTC, zoujiaqing wrote:I think the example is too simple to make a comparison.At least in my Debian virtual machine Archttp behaves very close to Fasthttp! Even better than Fasthttp! I hope DLang can develop better in the field of microservices in the future. I just released the first test version of Archttp: https://forum.dlang.org/thread/jckjrgnmgsulewnrefpr forum.dlang.org I just passed the test on macOS and Linux! I will continue to optimize Archttp's performance and cross-platform capabilities in the future. We hope you can give us some optimization suggestions to make DLang Web framework performance better.Very cool! Will try to play with it.
May 15 2022