• Pierre Rouleau (14/14) Apr 07 2005 Greetings,
• Sean Kelly (4/16) Apr 07 2005 None of Phobos was altered between .119 and .120 concerning version iden...
• Walter (4/16) Apr 07 2005 Yes, and it'll get fixed in the next update. It doesn't matter at the

Pierre Rouleau <prouleau impathnetworks.com> writes:

Greetings,

I just starting to look at D after a quick look some time ago.

Just noticed that the changelog for v 0.120 
(http://www.digitalmars.com/d/changelog.html#new0120)

states that:

" Changed AMD64 predefined version to X86_64."

however, dmd/src/phobos/object.d (in version 0.120) contains:


version (AMD64)
{
     ...

}


that looks to me as a bug.  Is it?

Cheers,

Pierre Rouleau

Sean Kelly <sean f4.ca> writes:

In article <d34peb$16bb$1 digitaldaemon.com>, Pierre Rouleau says...
Greetings,

I just starting to look at D after a quick look some time ago.

Just noticed that the changelog for v 0.120 
(http://www.digitalmars.com/d/changelog.html#new0120)

states that:

" Changed AMD64 predefined version to X86_64."

however, dmd/src/phobos/object.d (in version 0.120) contains:


version (AMD64)
{
     ...

}


that looks to me as a bug.  Is it?

None of Phobos was altered between .119 and .120 concerning version identifiers.
That will likely happen in a later release?


Sean

"Walter" <newshound digitalmars.com> writes:

"Pierre Rouleau" <prouleau impathnetworks.com> wrote in message
news:d34peb$16bb$1 digitaldaemon.com...
 Greetings,

 I just starting to look at D after a quick look some time ago.

 Just noticed that the changelog for v 0.120
 (http://www.digitalmars.com/d/changelog.html#new0120)

 states that:

 " Changed AMD64 predefined version to X86_64."

 however, dmd/src/phobos/object.d (in version 0.120) contains:


 version (AMD64)
 {
      ...

 }


 that looks to me as a bug.  Is it?

Yes, and it'll get fixed in the next update. It doesn't matter at the
moment, though, since there is no X86_64 code generator!