• Pablo Aguilar (2/2) May 25 2004 Is there going to be a process_sequence (and maybe module_sequence and
• Matthew (6/8) May 25 2004 A very good idea. I've certainly planned such things in general, but jus...
• Pablo Aguilar (3/7) May 25 2004 anything
• Matthew (7/15) May 25 2004 Cool.

"Pablo Aguilar" <paguilarg hotmail.com> writes:

Is there going to be a process_sequence (and maybe module_sequence and
thread_sequence) anywhere in the future? near future, maybe?

"Matthew" <matthew.hat stlsoft.dot.org> writes:

A very good idea. I've certainly planned such things in general, but just not
got
round to it.

I'm desperately trying to get 1.7.1 out the door, so I don't want to add
anything
new. However, if you remind me in a week or so, I'll see what I can do. ;)

"Pablo Aguilar" <paguilarg hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:c90i2s$2gln$1 digitaldaemon.com...
 Is there going to be a process_sequence (and maybe module_sequence and
 thread_sequence) anywhere in the future? near future, maybe?

"Pablo Aguilar" <paguilarg hotmail.com> writes:

Sure, I'll keep buggin' you, no problem...

 A very good idea. I've certainly planned such things in general, but just

not got
 round to it.

 I'm desperately trying to get 1.7.1 out the door, so I don't want to add

anything
 new. However, if you remind me in a week or so, I'll see what I can do. ;)

"Matthew" <matthew.hat stlsoft.dot.org> writes:

Cool.

I have several utilities that I've needed to implement/finalise for a long long
time, and which could use a nice Win32 process/etc. enumeration, so it could be
a
nice tying up of requirements.

Just not yet ... ;)

"Pablo Aguilar" <paguilarg hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:c90nbh$2pke$1 digitaldaemon.com...
 Sure, I'll keep buggin' you, no problem...

 A very good idea. I've certainly planned such things in general, but just

 not got
 round to it.

 I'm desperately trying to get 1.7.1 out the door, so I don't want to add

 anything
 new. However, if you remind me in a week or so, I'll see what I can do. ;)