• Helge M. Olsen (8/8) Oct 24 2001 Hi.
• Jan Knepper (5/13) Oct 24 2001 Well, the files are not actually part of the packages, but part of the
• Helge M. Olsen (38/42) Oct 24 2001 Thanks for the mail, now it comes a little bit further, but when compili...
• Jan Knepper (3/22) Oct 24 2001 commctrl.h on it's way in email...
• Helge M. Olsen (17/17) Oct 24 2001 Gets better, but stops with the following:
• Jan Knepper (10/27) Oct 24 2001 Which compiler version are you running?
• Helge M. Olsen (11/20) Oct 24 2001 latest
• Jan Knepper (6/17) Oct 24 2001 As far as I have experienced and as much as it may be a thorn in Wal...
• Helge M. Olsen (14/18) Oct 26 2001 latest
• Jan Knepper (2/6) Oct 26 2001 Hmmm, I don't think there is an ../../afximpl.cpp, only a .h file...
• Helge M. Olsen (7/13) Oct 26 2001 Correct. Strange that it's not there (or that it's mentioned in the

"Helge M. Olsen" <helge ear.wox.org> writes:

Hi.

I see someone else here has asked about this as well, but why isn't the
necessary include files to compile mfc in the packages? I get errors about
not finding zmouse.h, why isn't that either in hte mfc or (better?) in the
compiler packages? Have I missed something here?

Regards
---
Helge Olsen

Jan Knepper <jan smartsoft.cc> writes:

Well, the files are not actually part of the packages, but part of the
Microsoft SDK.
Let me see if I can email them to you directly.

Jan



"Helge M. Olsen" wrote:

 Hi.

 I see someone else here has asked about this as well, but why isn't the
 necessary include files to compile mfc in the packages? I get errors about
 not finding zmouse.h, why isn't that either in hte mfc or (better?) in the
 compiler packages? Have I missed something here?

 Regards
 ---
 Helge Olsen

"Helge M. Olsen" <helge ear.wox.org> writes:

"Jan Knepper" <jan smartsoft.cc> wrote in message
news:3BD7302D.A092107B smartsoft.cc...
 Well, the files are not actually part of the packages, but part of the
 Microsoft SDK.
 Let me see if I can email them to you directly.

 Jan

Thanks for the mail, now it comes a little bit further, but when compiling
the lib I get the following errors:

 REM Output to .

SC -cpp -Ae -Ar -mn -o+time -NL -5 -a8 -Nc -c -H -HO- -wx -w- -w3 -w6 -w7 -w
11 -w12 -w17 -D__JAK__ -D_X86_ -D_MT -D_MBCS=1 -I..\..\..\include -I\atl\inc
lude -HF.\stdafx.SYM -o.\stdafx.PCO ..\..\stdafx.h
 { ASSERT(::IsWindow(m_hWnd));  return (int) ::SendMessage(m_hWnd,
TTM_GETDELAYTIME, dwDuration, 0L); }

^
..\..\..\include\afxcmn2.inl(229) : Error: undefined identifier
'TTM_GETDELAYTIME'
 { ASSERT(::IsWindow(m_hWnd));  ::SendMessage(m_hWnd, TTM_GETMARGIN, 0,
(LPARAM)lprc); }
                                                                   ^
..\..\..\include\afxcmn2.inl(231) : Error: undefined identifier
'TTM_GETMARGIN'
 { ASSERT(::IsWindow(m_hWnd));  return (int) ::SendMessage(m_hWnd,
TTM_GETMAXTIPWIDTH, 0, 0L); }

^
..\..\..\include\afxcmn2.inl(233) : Error: undefined identifier
'TTM_GETMAXTIPWIDTH'
 { ASSERT(::IsWindow(m_hWnd));  return (COLORREF) ::SendMessage(m_hWnd,
TTM_GETTIPBKCOLOR, 0, 0L); }

^
..\..\..\include\afxcmn2.inl(235) : Error: undefined identifier
'TTM_GETTIPBKCOLOR'
 { ASSERT(::IsWindow(m_hWnd));  return (COLORREF) ::SendMessage(m_hWnd,
TTM_GETTIPTEXTCOLOR, 0, 0L); }

^
..\..\..\include\afxcmn2.inl(237) : Error: undefined identifier
'TTM_GETTIPTEXTCOLOR'
Fatal error: too many errors
--- errorlevel 1

Any suggestions?

--
Helge Olsen

Jan Knepper <jan smartsoft.cc> writes:

commctrl.h on it's way in email...

Jan



"Helge M. Olsen" wrote:

 "Jan Knepper" <jan smartsoft.cc> wrote in message
 news:3BD7302D.A092107B smartsoft.cc...
 Well, the files are not actually part of the packages, but part of the
 Microsoft SDK.
 Let me see if I can email them to you directly.

 Jan

 Thanks for the mail, now it comes a little bit further, but when compiling
 the lib I get the following errors:

  REM Output to .

 SC -cpp -Ae -Ar -mn -o+time -NL -5 -a8 -Nc -c -H -HO- -wx -w- -w3 -w6 -w7 -w
 11 -w12 -w17 -D__JAK__ -D_X86_ -D_MT -D_MBCS=1 -I..\..\..\include -I\atl\inc
 lude -HF.\stdafx.SYM -o.\stdafx.PCO ..\..\stdafx.h
  { ASSERT(::IsWindow(m_hWnd));  return (int) ::SendMessage(m_hWnd,
 TTM_GETDELAYTIME, dwDuration, 0L); }

 ^
 ..\..\..\include\afxcmn2.inl(229) : Error: undefined identifier
 'TTM_GETDELAYTIME'

"Helge M. Olsen" <helge ear.wox.org> writes:

Gets better, but stops with the following:





    SC -cpp -Ae -Ar -mn -o+time -NL -5 -a8 -Nc -c -H -HO- -wx -w- -w3 -w6 -w
7 -w11 -w12 -w17 -D__JAK__ -D_X86_ -D_MT -D_MBCS=1 -I..\..\..\include -I\atl
\inc
lude -o.\daocore.obj ..\..\daocore.cpp
Internal error: eh 682
--- errorlevel 1
SMAKE fatal error: command "SC" returned with error code 1
Stopping.

C:\dm\MFC\src\SC\LIB>

---
Maybe it'd be a good idea to put some useful links on the download page? I
appreciate your efforts here, but it seems to me that many people must have
had these problems before :-)

Regards
--
Helge Olsen

Jan Knepper <jan smartsoft.cc> writes:

Which compiler version are you running?
Try to use 8.1d1n (07/21/2001)
This is the version that will compile MFC. I would not rely yet on the latest
version of the compiler with all the template changes.

I guess it would be good if we made a diversion with the compiler between:
STABLE (which would be 8.1d1n I guess) and
CURRENT (which would be 8.21n I guess)

Walter do you think that makes sense?

Jan



"Helge M. Olsen" wrote:

 Gets better, but stops with the following:

     SC -cpp -Ae -Ar -mn -o+time -NL -5 -a8 -Nc -c -H -HO- -wx -w- -w3 -w6 -w
 7 -w11 -w12 -w17 -D__JAK__ -D_X86_ -D_MT -D_MBCS=1 -I..\..\..\include -I\atl
 \inc
 lude -o.\daocore.obj ..\..\daocore.cpp
 Internal error: eh 682
 --- errorlevel 1
 SMAKE fatal error: command "SC" returned with error code 1
 Stopping.

 C:\dm\MFC\src\SC\LIB>

 ---
 Maybe it'd be a good idea to put some useful links on the download page? I
 appreciate your efforts here, but it seems to me that many people must have
 had these problems before :-)

 Regards
 --
 Helge Olsen

"Helge M. Olsen" <helge ear.wox.org> writes:

"Jan Knepper" <jan smartsoft.cc> wrote in message
news:3BD7462D.13064E3D smartsoft.cc...
 Which compiler version are you running?
 Try to use 8.1d1n (07/21/2001)
 This is the version that will compile MFC. I would not rely yet on the

latest
 version of the compiler with all the template changes.

I downloaded 8.2, assuming that newer is better (though it's stupid of me,
being a sysadmin and all). I'll try the version you suggest tomorrow. Is 8.2
not stable even though there is an 8.21 which is said to be beta?

 I guess it would be good if we made a diversion with the compiler between:
 STABLE (which would be 8.1d1n I guess) and
 CURRENT (which would be 8.21n I guess)

I'll try the currents tomorrow, before "downgrading". Thanks for all help so
far

 Walter do you think that makes sense?

 Jan

Regards
--
Helge Olsen

Jan Knepper <jan smartsoft.cc> writes:

"Helge M. Olsen" wrote:

 "Jan Knepper" <jan smartsoft.cc> wrote in message
 news:3BD7462D.13064E3D smartsoft.cc...
 Which compiler version are you running?
 Try to use 8.1d1n (07/21/2001)
 This is the version that will compile MFC. I would not rely yet on the

 latest
 version of the compiler with all the template changes.

 I downloaded 8.2, assuming that newer is better (though it's stupid of me,
 being a sysadmin and all). I'll try the version you suggest tomorrow. Is 8.2
 not stable even though there is an 8.21 which is said to be beta?

<g> As far as I have experienced and as much as it may be a thorn in Walter's
flesh, I could not say that either 8.2 or 8.21 is stable. I have not been able
to compile any of my commercial projects with either one of them while 8.1d1n
compiles them just fine... Unfortunately the web site might not be as clear...

Jan

"Helge M. Olsen" <helge ear.wox.org> writes:

"Jan Knepper" <jan smartsoft.cc> wrote in message
news:3BD7462D.13064E3D smartsoft.cc...
 Which compiler version are you running?
 Try to use 8.1d1n (07/21/2001)
 This is the version that will compile MFC. I would not rely yet on the

latest
 version of the compiler with all the template changes.

I couldn't find any file dated 07/21/01 at the ftp site. Tried with
dm81dc.zip and dm81ec.zip from the ftp server:

C:\dm\MFC\src\SC\DLL>smake -f sfc50.mak

Both give the following error (downloaded mfc4.21.tar.gz and
atl2.02.tar.gz):
..\..\FIXALLOC.CPP(61) : Warning 6: value of expression is not used
SMAKE fatal error: don't know how to make ..\..\afximpl.cpp
Stopping.


Regards
--
Helge Olsen

Jan Knepper <jan smartsoft.cc> writes:

 Both give the following error (downloaded mfc4.21.tar.gz and
 atl2.02.tar.gz):
 ..\..\FIXALLOC.CPP(61) : Warning 6: value of expression is not used
 SMAKE fatal error: don't know how to make ..\..\afximpl.cpp

Hmmm, I don't think there is an ../../afximpl.cpp, only a .h file...

Jan

"Helge M. Olsen" <helge ear.wox.org> writes:

"Jan Knepper" <jan smartsoft.cc> wrote in message
news:3BD979DA.881C260F smartsoft.cc...
 Both give the following error (downloaded mfc4.21.tar.gz and
 atl2.02.tar.gz):
 ..\..\FIXALLOC.CPP(61) : Warning 6: value of expression is not used
 SMAKE fatal error: don't know how to make ..\..\afximpl.cpp

 Hmmm, I don't think there is an ../../afximpl.cpp, only a .h file...

Correct. Strange that it's not there (or that it's mentioned in the
makefile(s))...

 Jan

Regards
--
Helge Olsen