• Walter (2/2) Sep 28 2002 I'll address the bug reports in the next release. This one adds RAII.
• anderson (13/15) Sep 29 2002 Your a machine Walter (in the best sense of the word).
• Walter (7/24) Sep 29 2002 Thanks! I'm thinking that I need to put a freeze on new features, go bac...
• anderson (3/6) Oct 01 2002 I can't wait!
• Joe Battelle (4/5) Sep 30 2002 You're forgiven for working on the fun stuff first--just this once (and ...
• Walter (7/14) Sep 30 2002 because
• Sandor Hojtsy (9/11) Sep 30 2002 The specs don't state if an auto reference can be assigned to anything o...
• Walter (1/1) Sep 30 2002 ok.

"Walter" <walter digitalmars.com> writes:

I'll address the bug reports in the next release. This one adds RAII.

www.digitalmars.com/d/changelog.html

"anderson" <anderson firestar.com.au> writes:

Your a machine Walter (in the best sense of the word).

How long do you reckon until version 1? I really don't care how long it
takes for it to be released, just that it's done well (as it is already).

I guess what I really want to ask is, what else do you plan to do to D
before version 1 (not to spoil any surprises or anything)?

I thought templates and operator overloading were planned for version 2, but
now they seem headed for v1 (I'm not complaining ;) ).  The point is that
your adding a lot of cool stuff to go into v1 and that's great.   If that's
what goes into v1, v2 will probably extrudinary.

Anyway, keep up the excellent work.

-Walters One Man Fan Club

"Walter" <walter digitalmars.com> wrote in message
news:an5ull$cei$1 digitaldaemon.com...
 I'll address the bug reports in the next release. This one adds RAII.

 www.digitalmars.com/d/changelog.html

"Walter" <walter digitalmars.com> writes:

Thanks! I'm thinking that I need to put a freeze on new features, go back
and fix all the bug reports, clean up the documentation, and call it
v1. -Walter

"anderson" <anderson firestar.com.au> wrote in message
news:an6oaf$17dc$1 digitaldaemon.com...
 Your a machine Walter (in the best sense of the word).

 How long do you reckon until version 1? I really don't care how long it
 takes for it to be released, just that it's done well (as it is already).

 I guess what I really want to ask is, what else do you plan to do to D
 before version 1 (not to spoil any surprises or anything)?

 I thought templates and operator overloading were planned for version 2,

but
 now they seem headed for v1 (I'm not complaining ;) ).  The point is that
 your adding a lot of cool stuff to go into v1 and that's great.   If

that's
 what goes into v1, v2 will probably extrudinary.

 Anyway, keep up the excellent work.

 -Walters One Man Fan Club

 "Walter" <walter digitalmars.com> wrote in message
 news:an5ull$cei$1 digitaldaemon.com...
 I'll address the bug reports in the next release. This one adds RAII.

 www.digitalmars.com/d/changelog.html

"anderson" <anderson firestar.com.au> writes:

I can't wait!

"Walter" <walter digitalmars.com> wrote in message
news:an7kmf$23nq$1 digitaldaemon.com...
 Thanks! I'm thinking that I need to put a freeze on new features, go back
 and fix all the bug reports, clean up the documentation, and call it
 v1. -Walter

Joe Battelle <Joe_member pathlink.com> writes:

I'll address the bug reports in the next release. This one adds RAII.

You're forgiven for working on the fun stuff first--just this once (and because
I happen to need both things you implemented <g>).  Cheers for the ChangeLog
page.  Might want to document _volatile_ a bit--or at least remove the "we don't
need no stinking volatile" paragraph <g>.

"Walter" <walter digitalmars.com> writes:

"Joe Battelle" <Joe_member pathlink.com> wrote in message
news:an8upe$df4$1 digitaldaemon.com...
I'll address the bug reports in the next release. This one adds RAII.

 You're forgiven for working on the fun stuff first--just this once (and

because
 I happen to need both things you implemented <g>).

I admit to avoiding the interface bug. I think I'll have to face the music
on that next.

  Cheers for the ChangeLog
 page.

There are enough people using D now to make that a requirement.

 Might want to document _volatile_ a bit--or at least remove the "we don't
 need no stinking volatile" paragraph <g>.

Thanks.

"Sandor Hojtsy" <hojtsy index.hu> writes:

"Walter" <walter digitalmars.com> wrote in message
news:an5ull$cei$1 digitaldaemon.com...
 I'll address the bug reports in the next release. This one adds RAII.

 www.digitalmars.com/d/changelog.html

The specs don't state if an auto reference can be assigned to anything or
not. Walter: can you please put in a sentence about this?

Example
auto Foo r = new Foo();
Foo g = r; // valid or not?

Yours,
Sandor

"Walter" <walter digitalmars.com> writes:

ok.