On Wed, 26 Nov 2008 13:24:57 -0500, Jarrett Billingsley
<jarrett.billingsley@gmail.com> wrote: > scope int b() { .. } > > The reason I wonder is because I would expect that the compiler is > still allocating the delegate on the heap if you use the first syntax. > (the second is also shorter and clearer.)
Just as a point of reference (in D1)
scope Object a = new Object(); // Stack Allocated
scope Object b;
b = new Object(); // Heap Allocated
So there may be some merit to scope int b() { .. } vs scope int b(); b =
{...}
