• eco <xvt22b yahoo.fr> Apr 26 2007
• Walter Bright <newshound1 digitalmars.com> May 01 2007
• eco <xvt22b yahoo.fr> May 02 2007
• Walter Bright <newshound1 digitalmars.com> May 03 2007
• eco <xvt22b yahoo.fr> May 08 2007
• Dejan Lekic <dejan.lekic gmail.com> Dec 13 2007

eco <xvt22b yahoo.fr> writes:

Hi,
I'm working on a c++ framework under gpl. This project will embed a jscript
compiler, for now, dmdscript is in my mind the best choice, can I make a
branch on cpp dmdscript version ?

Walter Bright <newshound1 digitalmars.com> writes:

eco wrote:
 I'm working on a c++ framework under gpl. This project will embed a jscript
 compiler, for now, dmdscript is in my mind the best choice, can I make a
 branch on cpp dmdscript version ?


No, the C++ dmdscript is not GPL. The D version of it is, though.

eco <xvt22b yahoo.fr> writes:

ok, I will write my own, nevermind
thank's a lot for the sample code

Walter Bright <newshound1 digitalmars.com> writes:

eco wrote:
 ok, I will write my own, nevermind
 thank's a lot for the sample code


Why not just do your project in D? It'll save you a ton of time, not the 
least of which being you won't have to write your own.

eco <xvt22b yahoo.fr> writes:

because I get 18 years of c++ experience & 18 minutes of D

Dejan Lekic <dejan.lekic gmail.com> writes:

I have little less than that, and my (first commercial C++ project done 
in 1992) experience told me to switch to D. A C++ programmer does not 
need more than couple of hours to get along with D. :)

Anyway, I hope You will release your C++ version of JS interpreter under 
some open-source license. Preferably GPL v2.

Kind regards