• kenny <funisher gmail.com> Feb 22 2007
• Lars Ivar Igesund <larsivar igesund.net> Feb 22 2007
• Tyler Knott <tywebmail mailcity.com> Feb 22 2007
• torhu <fake address.dude> Feb 22 2007
• Stewart Gordon <smjg_1998 yahoo.com> Feb 23 2007

kenny <funisher gmail.com> writes:

I can't find any reference to it on the website. What exactly is version 1.0?
I'm not using tons of advanced features of D and it makes no difference for me.

Lars Ivar Igesund <larsivar igesund.net> writes:

kenny wrote:

 I can't find any reference to it on the website. What exactly is version
 1.0? I'm not using tons of advanced features of D and it makes no
 difference for me.


Language features added to DMD after release 1.000 will not work when using
that switch. 

-- 
Lars Ivar Igesund
blog at http://larsivi.net
DSource, #d.tango & #D: larsivi
Dancing the Tango

Tyler Knott <tywebmail mailcity.com> writes:

Lars Ivar Igesund wrote:
 Language features added to DMD after release 1.000 will not work when using
 that switch. 
 



void main() { mixin(`int foo;`); } //mixin declarations are definitely post-1.0

torhu <fake address.dude> writes:

Tyler Knott wrote:
 Lars Ivar Igesund wrote:
 Language features added to DMD after release 1.000 will not work when using
 that switch. 
 


 
 void main() { mixin(`int foo;`); } //mixin declarations are definitely post-1.0


I suppose it's only for features that break backward compatibility.  It 
enables implicit conversion from objects to void pointers.  That's all I 
know that it does as of 1.007.

If you need older (pre 'D spec 1') features to work, -d will enable some 
of them.  Implicit conversion from arrays to pointers comes to mind.

Stewart Gordon <smjg_1998 yahoo.com> writes:

torhu Wrote:

 Tyler Knott wrote:


 Except they do work?  This compiles on DMD 1.007 with -v1 (as 
 the only flag) without error:
 
 void main() { mixin(`int foo;`); } //mixin declarations are 
 definitely post-1.0


 I suppose it's only for features that break backward 
 compatibility.  It enables implicit conversion from objects to 
 void pointers.  That's all I know that it does as of 1.007.



Strikes me as a bug.  It would seem to me that the _whole point_ of it is to
enable programmers to explicitly target 1.0.  That is, at least in theory, they
can release code and make a valid statement that it will work in DMD 1.00, and
D 1.0 compilers in general.

Stewart.