www.digitalmars.com         C & C++   DMDScript  

digitalmars.D - std.bind

reply Andrei Alexandrescu <SeeWebsiteForEmail erdani.org> writes:
It was rightly suggested that std.bind either gets some love or gets 
removed from Phobos. Walter convinced me that delegates are a flexible 
alternative to std.bind's arcane notation.

One possible line of work would be to extend std.functional.curry, which 
is a bit limited right now.

At any rate, I'm considering deprecating std.bind. Its design and code 
look dated by today's standards (we've been a long way!) and hardly 
anyone seems to be using it. Should we deprecate it?


Andrei
Jun 17 2010
parent "Lars T. Kyllingstad" <public kyllingen.NOSPAMnet> writes:
On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 21:51:59 -0700, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:

 At any rate, I'm considering deprecating std.bind. Its design and code
 look dated by today's standards (we've been a long way!) and hardly
 anyone seems to be using it. Should we deprecate it?

I'm all for yanking it. -Lars
Jun 18 2010