digitalmars.D - sad
- another lurker <lurk lurk.urk> Apr 30 2010
- Arth Lloyd Flores <floresarthlloyd gmail.com> Apr 30 2010
- Piotrek <starpit tlen.pl> Apr 30 2010
- another lurker <lurker lurk.urk> Apr 30 2010
- Piotrek <starpit tlen.pl> Apr 30 2010
- Gurney Halleck <gurney.halleck dune.com> Apr 30 2010
- Piotrek <starpit tlen.pl> Apr 30 2010
- Gurney Halleck <gurney.halleck dune.com> Apr 30 2010
- Piotrek <starpit tlen.pl> Apr 30 2010
- Gurney Halleck <gurney.halleck dune.com> Apr 30 2010
- "Steven Schveighoffer" <schveiguy yahoo.com> Apr 30 2010
- Walter Bright <newshound1 digitalmars.com> May 01 2010
--00c09f905b042aafae0485768f62 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 where did you get this news? On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 12:08 AM, another lurker <lurk lurk.urk> wrote:Tango is dead effective today
--00c09f905b042aafae0485768f62 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable where did you get this news?<br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Sat, May = 1, 2010 at 12:08 AM, another lurker <span dir=3D"ltr"><lurk lurk.urk>= </span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .= 8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;"> Tango is dead effective today<br> </blockquote></div><br> --00c09f905b042aafae0485768f62--
Apr 30 2010
W dniu 30.04.2010 19:42, Steven Schveighoffer pisze:On Fri, 30 Apr 2010 12:16:01 -0400, Arth Lloyd Flores <floresarthlloyd gmail.com> wrote:where did you get this news? On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 12:08 AM, another lurker <lurk lurk.urk> wrote:Tango is dead effective today
It is not dead. another lurker was just saying it is dead to him (he will not use it/has deleted it off of his hard drive). -Steve
Hi I've got impression that "another lurker" was trolling. Tango will never be dead - for D1 it the only option. So until D1 is used it's alive. Different issue is that license chosen for Tango isn't the best one. I'm all the way with Walter that license for standard library should be 100% legal correct. Cheers Piotrek
Apr 30 2010
In a manner I was trolling. But it is truth in it. I liked Tango but for long time suspected there is too much personal issues in Tango leaders. Today I know Tango team wants to have famous not D to have success. Don't know how to express sorry for poor English. Tango want force people use Tango. Tango is poison. == Quote from Piotrek (starpit tlen.pl)'s articleW dniu 30.04.2010 19:42, Steven Schveighoffer pisze:On Fri, 30 Apr 2010 12:16:01 -0400, Arth Lloyd Flores <floresarthlloyd gmail.com> wrote:where did you get this news? On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 12:08 AM, another lurker <lurk lurk.urk> wrote:Tango is dead effective today
It is not dead. another lurker was just saying it is dead to him (he will not use it/has deleted it off of his hard drive). -Steve
I've got impression that "another lurker" was trolling. Tango will never be dead - for D1 it the only option. So until D1 is used it's alive. Different issue is that license chosen for Tango isn't the best one. I'm all the way with Walter that license for standard library should be 100% legal correct. Cheers Piotrek
Apr 30 2010
W dniu 30.04.2010 20:32, another lurker pisze:In a manner I was trolling. But it is truth in it. I liked Tango but for long time suspected there is too much personal issues in Tango leaders. Today I know Tango team wants to have famous not D to have success. Don't know how to express sorry for poor English. Tango want force people use Tango. Tango is poison.
Ok. I get your point. But I don't blame Tango team for anything (even admire their hard work). Of cource it would be great if all developers worked together. It would be idyll. However, note that some Tango developers fight on two fronts. The most sad thing is when someone starts to throw a hate at other after his failure in enforcing own will. Piotrek
Apr 30 2010
== Quote from Piotrek (starpit tlen.pl)'s articleW dniu 30.04.2010 20:32, another lurker pisze:In a manner I was trolling. But it is truth in it. I liked Tango but for long time suspected there is too much personal issues in Tango leaders. Today I know Tango team wants to have famous not D to have success. Don't know how to express sorry for poor English. Tango want force people use Tango. Tango is poison.
admire their hard work). Of cource it would be great if all developers worked together. It would be idyll. However, note that some Tango developers fight on two fronts. The most sad thing is when someone starts to throw a hate at other after his failure in enforcing own will. Piotrek
Quite. someone -----> Tango other -----> Walter own will -----> throwing Phobos away and adopting Tango Here, FTFY. -- Gurney Halleck
Apr 30 2010
W dniu 30.04.2010 21:02, Gurney Halleck pisze:The most sad thing is when someone starts to throw a hate at other after his failure in enforcing own will. Piotrek
Quite. someone -----> Tango other -----> Walter own will -----> throwing Phobos away and adopting Tango Here, FTFY. -- Gurney Halleck
I didn't mean it. I've never seen key people from Tango to be hostile to Walter (they rather cooperate fruitfully). On the other hand I can say that I understand those frustrated people (and I don't have Tango users on my mind but frustrated people in general- we had many examples in the past) . They as many other hoped to make D successful instantly. For some unknown reason this didn't happen (at least on a large scale - however we won't give up). After waiting some time and not seeing huge improvements they started witch-hunt. Cheers Piotrek
Apr 30 2010
== Quote from Piotrek (starpit tlen.pl)'s articleW dniu 30.04.2010 21:02, Gurney Halleck pisze:The most sad thing is when someone starts to throw a hate at other after his failure in enforcing own will. Piotrek
Quite. someone -----> Tango other -----> Walter own will -----> throwing Phobos away and adopting Tango Here, FTFY. -- Gurney Halleck
Walter (they rather cooperate fruitfully).
Ow isn't that generous of them. Kindly please indulge us with a few examples. -- Gurney Halleck
Apr 30 2010
W dniu 30.04.2010 22:03, Gurney Halleck pisze:Gurney Halleck
Walter (they rather cooperate fruitfully).
Ow isn't that generous of them. Kindly please indulge us with a few examples. -- Gurney Halleck
Examples of what? Fruits? dmd, druntime, druntime People? Sean, Don, Steven, ... P.S. I guess we can stop discussion and do something more useful. From me EOT (unless I couldn't resist ;). Cheers Piotrek
Apr 30 2010
Gurney Halleck <gurney.halleck dune.com> == Quote from Piotrek (starpit tlen.pl)'s articleW dniu 30.04.2010 22:03, Gurney Halleck pisze:Gurney Halleck
Walter (they rather cooperate fruitfully).
Ow isn't that generous of them. Kindly please indulge us with a few examples. -- Gurney Halleck
Fruits? dmd, druntime, druntime People? Sean, Don, Steven, ...
Your kidding, right? Sean, Don, Steven are not key people from Tango to cooperate fruitfully. Sean, Don, Steven left Tango to join Phobos fruitfully.P.S. I guess we can stop discussion and do something more useful. From me EOT (unless I couldn't resist ;). Cheers Piotrek
Nice try to have the last word. -- Gurney Halleck
Apr 30 2010
On Fri, 30 Apr 2010 12:16:01 -0400, Arth Lloyd Flores <floresarthlloyd gmail.com> wrote:where did you get this news? On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 12:08 AM, another lurker <lurk lurk.urk> wrote:Tango is dead effective today
It is not dead. another lurker was just saying it is dead to him (he will not use it/has deleted it off of his hard drive). -Steve
Apr 30 2010
another lurker wrote:Tango is dead effective today
Let's turn down the voltage here, way down, please. Email is a classic medium for well-intentioned people to misunderstand each other. I've often discovered that differences via email melt away to nothing if we're in the same room having a beer.
May 01 2010