• Zarathustra <adam.chrapkowski gmail.com> Nov 27 2008
• BCS <ao pathlink.com> Nov 27 2008
• "Jarrett Billingsley" <jarrett.billingsley gmail.com> Nov 27 2008

Zarathustra <adam.chrapkowski gmail.com> writes:

Proposition: className.this for nested classes

for ex:
class Foo{
  void fnc1(){}

  class Bar{
    void fnc1
    void fnc2(){ Foo.this.fnc1; }
  }
}

instead of:
class Foo{
  Foo Foo_this(){ return this; }
  void fnc1(){}

  class Bar{
    void fnc1
    void fnc2(){ Foo_this.fnc1; }
  }
}

BCS <ao pathlink.com> writes:

Reply to Zarathustra,

 Proposition: className.this for nested classes
 
 for ex:
 class Foo{
 void fnc1(){}
 class Bar{
 void fnc1
 void fnc2(){ Foo.this.fnc1; }
 }
 }
 instead of:
 class Foo{
 Foo Foo_this(){ return this; }
 void fnc1(){}
 class Bar{
 void fnc1
 void fnc2(){ Foo_this.fnc1; }
 }
 }


I think that "outer" has been proposed for that as well.

"Jarrett Billingsley" <jarrett.billingsley gmail.com> writes:

On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 12:39 PM, Zarathustra
<adam.chrapkowski gmail.com> wrote:
 Proposition: className.this for nested classes

 for ex:
 class Foo{
  void fnc1(){}

  class Bar{
    void fnc1
    void fnc2(){ Foo.this.fnc1; }
  }
 }

 instead of:
 class Foo{
  Foo Foo_this(){ return this; }
  void fnc1(){}

  class Bar{
    void fnc1
    void fnc2(){ Foo_this.fnc1; }
  }
 }


You can already access that through this.outer.