digitalmars.D - owner pointers
- Sclytrack <idiot hotmail.com> Nov 29 2009
- "Denis Koroskin" <2korden gmail.com> Nov 29 2009
Assume: no garbage collector
----------------------------
Let us say that we have two types of pointers. Owner pointers and view pointers.
owner(pointer(int))
view(pointer(int))
owner(pointer(int)) routineA()
{
owner(pointer(int)) a = malloc();
//The compiler checks that ownership is returned or passed on to
//another routine. (Possible?)
return a;
}
-------------------- //Yes 20 long "-"
void doStuffA( view(pointer(int)) param)
{
//not in charge of the deallocation.
}
void doStuffB( owner(pointer(int)) param)
{
free(param);
}
void routineB()
{
owner(pointer(int)) a = malloc();
doStuffA(a);
doStuffB(a); //Passes on ownership.
//routineB is no longer in charge of the deallocation, because of doStuffB.
}
--------------------
void usingStuff()
{
owner(pointer(int)) a = routineA();
//You are in charge of the deallocation.
free(a);
}
--------------------
Nov 29 2009
On Sun, 29 Nov 2009 13:10:27 +0300, Sclytrack <idiot hotmail.com> wrote:Assume: no garbage collector ---------------------------- Let us say that we have two types of pointers. Owner pointers and view pointers. owner(pointer(int)) view(pointer(int)) owner(pointer(int)) routineA() { owner(pointer(int)) a = malloc(); //The compiler checks that ownership is returned or passed on to //another routine. (Possible?) return a; } -------------------- //Yes 20 long "-" void doStuffA( view(pointer(int)) param) { //not in charge of the deallocation. } void doStuffB( owner(pointer(int)) param) { free(param); } void routineB() { owner(pointer(int)) a = malloc(); doStuffA(a); doStuffB(a); //Passes on ownership. //routineB is no longer in charge of the deallocation, because of doStuffB. } -------------------- void usingStuff() { owner(pointer(int)) a = routineA(); //You are in charge of the deallocation. free(a); } --------------------
What's the point of this post?
Nov 29 2009








"Denis Koroskin" <2korden gmail.com>