• kareem <kareemku gmail.com> Mar 06 2007
• Tomas Lindquist Olsen <tomas famolsen.dk> Mar 06 2007
• renoX <renosky free.fr> Mar 06 2007
• "Jarrett Billingsley" <kb3ctd2 yahoo.com> Mar 06 2007

kareem <kareemku gmail.com> writes:

hi all 

this my firts time try ' d ' 

to who ever havetry "d"

which one easier "D" or "C"

thanks b 4

Tomas Lindquist Olsen <tomas famolsen.dk> writes:

kareem wrote:

 which one easier "D" or "C"


Why D of course :)

renoX <renosky free.fr> writes:

kareem a écrit :
 hi all 
 
 this my firts time try ' d ' 
 
 to who ever havetry "d"
 
 which one easier "D" or "C"
 
 thanks b 4


D is bigger than C so there are more things to learn, but as it has 
strong typing, array bond checking, a garbage collector, etc I think 
it's easier to use.

renoX

"Jarrett Billingsley" <kb3ctd2 yahoo.com> writes:

"kareem" <kareemku gmail.com> wrote in message 
news:esjnvc$cs0$1 digitalmars.com...
 hi all

 this my firts time try ' d '

 to who ever havetry "d"

 which one easier "D" or "C"

 thanks b 4


D lets you program without having to worry about managing every last byte of 
memory that your program uses.  It lets you manipulate strings without 
tearing your hair out.  It lets you organize your program how you want 
instead of how the compiler wants you to.  It lets you write generalizable 
code instead of having to rewrite code over and over for different types.

D is far easier than C.